Task sharing and teamwork: clinician preferences for alcohol screening and brief interventions in cardiology

A total of 664 cardiology clinicians responded to a cross-sectional survey (30.9% response rate), including 55.1% nurses, 21.4% assistant nurses, 18.8% doctors, and 4.7% other clinical staff. Among these participants, 87.5% indicated that patients should be screened for alcohol use on cardiology wards, 79.8% in outpatient clinics, 49.1% in emergency departments, and 45.9% on coronary care units. Doctors and nurses were the preferred professions to be responsible for screening across all clinical contexts, while fewer respondents indicated that assistant nurses or physiotherapists should be responsible for screening (p < .001). Most participants (85.2%) indicated that patients should be screened in more than one clinical context and 84.6% indicated that more than one profession should be responsible for alcohol screening. Clinicians' preferred modality for assessing alcohol use was verbal screening (92% of participants), followed by questionnaires (53.5%), digital tools (28.5%), and alcohol biomarkers (22.1%, p < .001). Just over half of participants (58%) indicated that they would like to attend training on brief interventions. Findings suggest that task sharing, teamwork, and training may be effective strategies for implementation of alcohol screening and brief interventions in clinical cardiology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Research Notes
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07452-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Task sharing and teamwork: clinician preferences for alcohol screening and brief interventions in cardiology

Kristina Hambræus, Matthias Lidin, Sara Wallhed Finn, Paul Welfordsson et al.
1 citations
BMC Research Notes
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
1.35
article

Task sharing and teamwork: clinician preferences for alcohol screening and brief interventions in cardiology

Kristina Hambræus, Matthias Lidin, Sara Wallhed Finn, Paul Welfordsson, Anna‐Karin Danielsson, Frieder Braunschweig, Caroline Björck, Bartosz Grzymala-Lubanski, Ida Haugen Löfman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A total of 664 cardiology clinicians responded to a cross-sectional survey (30.9% response rate), including 55.1% nurses, 21.4% assistant nurses, 18.8% doctors, and 4.7% other clinical staff. Among these participants, 87.5% indicated that patients should be screened for alcohol use on cardiology wards, 79.8% in outpatient clinics, 49.1% in emergency departments, and 45.9% on coronary care units. Doctors and nurses were the preferred professions to be responsible for screening across all clinical contexts, while fewer respondents indicated that assistant nurses or physiotherapists should be responsible for screening (p < .001). Most participants (85.2%) indicated that patients should be screened in more than one clinical context and 84.6% indicated that more than one profession should be responsible for alcohol screening. Clinicians' preferred modality for assessing alcohol use was verbal screening (92% of participants), followed by questionnaires (53.5%), digital tools (28.5%), and alcohol biomarkers (22.1%, p < .001). Just over half of participants (58%) indicated that they would like to attend training on brief interventions. Findings suggest that task sharing, teamwork, and training may be effective strategies for implementation of alcohol screening and brief interventions in clinical cardiology.

BMC Research NotesVol. 18(1)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Falun Hospital (SE), Umeå University (SE)
Karolinska Institutet, Vetenskapsrådet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.