Diagnostic status influences rapport and communicative behaviours in dyadic interactions between autistic and non-autistic people

A growing body of research suggests that the behaviours and experiences of autistic and non-autistic people are influenced by whether they are interacting with someone of the same or different diagnostic status. However, little is known about the relationship between these behaviours and the experiences of rapport in matched and mixed neurotype dyads. Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model, our pre-registered analyses examine how participants' and their partners' diagnostic statuses influence linguistic, behavioural, and kinematic indices, and how these relate to feelings of rapport among autistic and (n = 57; 17 self-diagnosed) non-autistic (n = 51) participants interacting within autistic (n = 20), non-autistic (n = 17), and mixed autistic-non-autistic (n = 17) dyads. We found that autistic participants reported lower rapport regardless of their partner's diagnostic status, though awareness of their partner's diagnostic status had a moderating effect. We observed a linguistic difference, autistic participants produced longer mean utterance lengths, these and other behavioural or kinematic indices did not mediate the relationship between diagnostic status and rapport across neurotypes. The current work highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of communication dynamics in autism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330222
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic status influences rapport and communicative behaviours in dyadic interactions between autistic and non-autistic people

Danielle Ropar, Lorena Jiménez‐Sánchez, Robert A. Ackerman, Catherine J Crompton et al.
3 citations
PLoS ONE
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
4.29
article

Diagnostic status influences rapport and communicative behaviours in dyadic interactions between autistic and non-autistic people

Danielle Ropar, Lorena Jiménez‐Sánchez, Robert A. Ackerman, Catherine J Crompton, Noah J. Sasson, Sue Fletcher‐Watson, Sarah Foster, Themis Nikolas Efthimiou, Charlotte Wilks, Steff Lewis, Michelle Dodd
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that the behaviours and experiences of autistic and non-autistic people are influenced by whether they are interacting with someone of the same or different diagnostic status. However, little is known about the relationship between these behaviours and the experiences of rapport in matched and mixed neurotype dyads. Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model, our pre-registered analyses examine how participants' and their partners' diagnostic statuses influence linguistic, behavioural, and kinematic indices, and how these relate to feelings of rapport among autistic and (n = 57; 17 self-diagnosed) non-autistic (n = 51) participants interacting within autistic (n = 20), non-autistic (n = 17), and mixed autistic-non-autistic (n = 17) dyads. We found that autistic participants reported lower rapport regardless of their partner's diagnostic status, though awareness of their partner's diagnostic status had a moderating effect. We observed a linguistic difference, autistic participants produced longer mean utterance lengths, these and other behavioural or kinematic indices did not mediate the relationship between diagnostic status and rapport across neurotypes. The current work highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of communication dynamics in autism.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(8)
University of Nottingham (GB), The University of Texas at Dallas (US), Nottingham Trent University (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
John Templeton Foundation, Templeton World Charity Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.