Ground-Based Evaluation of Hourly Surface Ozone in China Using CAM-Chem Model Simulations and Himawari-8 Satellite Estimates

Surface ozone pollution poses a significant threat to human health and ecosystems. However, its highly variable spatiotemporal distribution, especially at hourly scales across China, complicates effective risk management. This variability presents substantial challenges for accurate estimation and forecasting, underscoring the importance of evaluating current hourly surface ozone estimation methods. Therefore, this study collaboratively evaluated the performance of chemical transport model simulations and satellite-based estimates of hourly surface ozone concentrations over mainland China in 2019. Using data from 3185 ground monitoring stations operated by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, as well as six independent observation sites in Hong Kong, Xianghe, Nam Co, Akedala, Longfengshan, and Waliguan, this study found that both datasets exhibited systematic biases and lacked spatiotemporal consistency. The Community Atmosphere Model with Chemistry simulation results exhibited an average relative bias of 23.17%, generally overestimated ozone concentrations in high-altitude regions, but outperformed the satellite-based estimates at the independent sites, while consistently underestimating ozone concentrations in densely populated urban areas. In contrast, the satellite-based estimates performed better in regions with dense monitoring sites, with mean biases typically within 10% of observations, but their accuracy was limited in remote areas due to sparse ground-based calibration. It is particularly noteworthy that both datasets showed deficiencies in capturing extremely high-value events, nighttime ozone variations, and dynamic transport processes, underscoring challenges in the representation of photochemical processes in the model and in the design of satellite estimation algorithms. The results highlight the importance of optimizing model parameterization schemes, improving satellite estimation algorithms, and integrating multi-source data to enhance the accuracy and stability of hourly ozone estimates. This study provides multi-scale quantitative insights into the relative strengths and limitations of different ozone estimation methods, laying a solid scientific foundation for future data integration, regional air quality management, and policy development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17173007
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ground-Based Evaluation of Hourly Surface Ozone in China Using CAM-Chem Model Simulations and Himawari-8 Satellite Estimates

Jing Peng, Jieming Chou, Fugang Li, Fuqiang Yang et al.
Remote Sensing
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

Ground-Based Evaluation of Hourly Surface Ozone in China Using CAM-Chem Model Simulations and Himawari-8 Satellite Estimates

Jing Peng, Jieming Chou, Fugang Li, Fuqiang Yang, Hong Wang, Dan Li, Kai Li, Peng Zhou, Younong Li
article en

Abstract

Surface ozone pollution poses a significant threat to human health and ecosystems. However, its highly variable spatiotemporal distribution, especially at hourly scales across China, complicates effective risk management. This variability presents substantial challenges for accurate estimation and forecasting, underscoring the importance of evaluating current hourly surface ozone estimation methods. Therefore, this study collaboratively evaluated the performance of chemical transport model simulations and satellite-based estimates of hourly surface ozone concentrations over mainland China in 2019. Using data from 3185 ground monitoring stations operated by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, as well as six independent observation sites in Hong Kong, Xianghe, Nam Co, Akedala, Longfengshan, and Waliguan, this study found that both datasets exhibited systematic biases and lacked spatiotemporal consistency. The Community Atmosphere Model with Chemistry simulation results exhibited an average relative bias of 23.17%, generally overestimated ozone concentrations in high-altitude regions, but outperformed the satellite-based estimates at the independent sites, while consistently underestimating ozone concentrations in densely populated urban areas. In contrast, the satellite-based estimates performed better in regions with dense monitoring sites, with mean biases typically within 10% of observations, but their accuracy was limited in remote areas due to sparse ground-based calibration. It is particularly noteworthy that both datasets showed deficiencies in capturing extremely high-value events, nighttime ozone variations, and dynamic transport processes, underscoring challenges in the representation of photochemical processes in the model and in the design of satellite estimation algorithms. The results highlight the importance of optimizing model parameterization schemes, improving satellite estimation algorithms, and integrating multi-source data to enhance the accuracy and stability of hourly ozone estimates. This study provides multi-scale quantitative insights into the relative strengths and limitations of different ozone estimation methods, laying a solid scientific foundation for future data integration, regional air quality management, and policy development.

Remote SensingVol. 17(17)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Xinjiang Astronomical Observatory (CN), Altaiskiy State Nature Biosphere Reserve (RU), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.