Diameter-Height relationship model for Shorea assamica in secondary tropical rainforest, South Borneo

Diameter-height relationship model is generally developed to facilitate the quantification of tree height at the individual level. However, the model’s reliability principally varies due to the influence of certain factors like site quality and type of species. Thus, a site species-specific model is recommended to support sustainable forest management. This study aims to evaluate the best-fit model for estimating the tree height of Shorea assamica in the secondary tropical rainforest, South Borneo. Data from forest inventory consisting of 1,440 tree diameter at breast height (DBH) and height measurements were used to evaluate five alternative models, i.e., Linear, Power, Exponential, Sigmoid, and Gompertz. These data were randomly split into two datasets, i.e., initial model development (1,009 trees) and model validation (431 trees). The model reliability was assessed and ranked using the coefficient of determination (R2), residual standard error (RSE), akaike information criterion (AIC), mean absolute error (MAE), and root means square error (RMSE). The results of the study obtained an average tree diameter of 42.8 cm with the inverval of 22-99 cm and a mean tree height of 16.6 m with the distribution of 11-31 m. The Power model showed the best fit to explain the relationship model between the diameter and height of the S. assamica with an R2 of 74% and an RMSE of 1.72 m. It indicated Power model could facilitate more efficient tree height estimation of S. assamica in the study site

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sylva Indonesiana
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32734/jsi.v8i2.18749
Primary Topic
Forest Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diameter-Height relationship model for Shorea assamica in secondary tropical rainforest, South Borneo

Pandu Yudha Adi Putra Wirabuana, Yusanto Nugroho, Budi Mulyana
2 links
Journal of Sylva Indonesiana
Forest Ecology and Conservation
article

Diameter-Height relationship model for Shorea assamica in secondary tropical rainforest, South Borneo

Pandu Yudha Adi Putra Wirabuana, Yusanto Nugroho, Budi Mulyana
article en

Abstract

Diameter-height relationship model is generally developed to facilitate the quantification of tree height at the individual level. However, the model’s reliability principally varies due to the influence of certain factors like site quality and type of species. Thus, a site species-specific model is recommended to support sustainable forest management. This study aims to evaluate the best-fit model for estimating the tree height of Shorea assamica in the secondary tropical rainforest, South Borneo. Data from forest inventory consisting of 1,440 tree diameter at breast height (DBH) and height measurements were used to evaluate five alternative models, i.e., Linear, Power, Exponential, Sigmoid, and Gompertz. These data were randomly split into two datasets, i.e., initial model development (1,009 trees) and model validation (431 trees). The model reliability was assessed and ranked using the coefficient of determination (R2), residual standard error (RSE), akaike information criterion (AIC), mean absolute error (MAE), and root means square error (RMSE). The results of the study obtained an average tree diameter of 42.8 cm with the inverval of 22-99 cm and a mean tree height of 16.6 m with the distribution of 11-31 m. The Power model showed the best fit to explain the relationship model between the diameter and height of the S. assamica with an R2 of 74% and an RMSE of 1.72 m. It indicated Power model could facilitate more efficient tree height estimation of S. assamica in the study site

Journal of Sylva IndonesianaVol. 8(2)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Lambung Mangkurat University (ID), University of Sopron (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Forest Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.