High measles and rubella vaccine coverage and seroprevalence among Zambian children participating in a measles and rubella supplementary immunization activity

Post-campaign coverage surveys estimate the proportion of previously unvaccinated children vaccinated during supplementary immunization activities (SIA) but cannot address whether susceptible children seronegative to measles and rubella viruses were vaccinated during the SIA. We conducted a cross-sectional serosurvey nested within the November 2020 measles-rubella SIA in Zambia, systematically sampling children aged 9 months to 5 years at 30 SIA sites in Choma and Ndola Districts. A questionnaire administered to caregivers collected the child's demographic information and vaccination history. Dried blood spot specimens were collected from child participants and for Immunoglobulin-G antibodies to measles and rubella viruses by enzyme immunoassay. We used the expected vaccination probability by age derived from Demographic and Health Surveys to quantify the value of the immunization campaign, estimating the proportion of children who would not have otherwise received routine MR doses. Among children enrolled with MR vaccination data (N = 2,364), 2,214 (94%) reported at least one routine MR dose before the SIA. We estimate 5.0% [95%CI, 4.2-5.9%] (n = 118/2364) of children would not have otherwise received routine MR dose 1 without the SIA and 23.4% [95%CI, 21.7-25.1] (n = 553/2364) would not have otherwise received routine MR dose 2. Thus, 1 in 3.5 doses were given to an MR un- or under-vaccinated child who may not have received that dose in the absence of an SIA. Eighty-six percent and 90% of children were measles and rubella seropositive before vaccination during the SIA. Thirty-six percent of children with no prior routine MR dose were measles seropositive, while nine percent of children with two prior routine MR doses were measles seronegative. Although children vaccinated during this SIA were highly likely to have previously received routine vaccinations, the SIA reached a considerable number of susceptible children. Monitoring SIA effectiveness and efficiency through standardized metrics and formats is critical for impactful vaccine delivery strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003209
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Virology and Viral Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High measles and rubella vaccine coverage and seroprevalence among Zambian children participating in a measles and rubella supplementary immunization activity

Gershom Chongwe, Japhet Matoba, Passwell Munachoonga, Innocent C. Bwalya et al.
2 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Virology and Viral Diseases
2.71
article

High measles and rubella vaccine coverage and seroprevalence among Zambian children participating in a measles and rubella supplementary immunization activity

Gershom Chongwe, Japhet Matoba, Passwell Munachoonga, Innocent C. Bwalya, Evans Betha, Gloria Musukwa, Kelvin Kapungu, Princess Kayeye, Irene Mutale, Amy K. Winter, Constance Sakala, Phillimon Ndubani, Philip E. Thuma, Mutinta Hamahuwa, Andrea C. Carcelen, Matthew J. Ferrari, William J. Moss, Edgar Simulundu, Kalumbu H. Matakala, Shaun Truelove, Christine Prosperi, Simon Mutembo, Nchimunya Chaavwa, Lombe Kampamba, Ken Situtu, Webster Mufwambi, Francis Dien Mwansa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Post-campaign coverage surveys estimate the proportion of previously unvaccinated children vaccinated during supplementary immunization activities (SIA) but cannot address whether susceptible children seronegative to measles and rubella viruses were vaccinated during the SIA. We conducted a cross-sectional serosurvey nested within the November 2020 measles-rubella SIA in Zambia, systematically sampling children aged 9 months to 5 years at 30 SIA sites in Choma and Ndola Districts. A questionnaire administered to caregivers collected the child's demographic information and vaccination history. Dried blood spot specimens were collected from child participants and for Immunoglobulin-G antibodies to measles and rubella viruses by enzyme immunoassay. We used the expected vaccination probability by age derived from Demographic and Health Surveys to quantify the value of the immunization campaign, estimating the proportion of children who would not have otherwise received routine MR doses. Among children enrolled with MR vaccination data (N = 2,364), 2,214 (94%) reported at least one routine MR dose before the SIA. We estimate 5.0% [95%CI, 4.2-5.9%] (n = 118/2364) of children would not have otherwise received routine MR dose 1 without the SIA and 23.4% [95%CI, 21.7-25.1] (n = 553/2364) would not have otherwise received routine MR dose 2. Thus, 1 in 3.5 doses were given to an MR un- or under-vaccinated child who may not have received that dose in the absence of an SIA. Eighty-six percent and 90% of children were measles and rubella seropositive before vaccination during the SIA. Thirty-six percent of children with no prior routine MR dose were measles seropositive, while nine percent of children with two prior routine MR doses were measles seronegative. Although children vaccinated during this SIA were highly likely to have previously received routine vaccinations, the SIA reached a considerable number of susceptible children. Monitoring SIA effectiveness and efficiency through standardized metrics and formats is critical for impactful vaccine delivery strategies.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(8)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Ministry of Health (ZM), Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Georgia (US), Golden Valley Agricultural Research Trust (ZM), Tropical Diseases Research Centre (ZM)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Virology and Viral Diseases
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.