Predicting and Analyzing Academic Performance of CITU CCS Students Using Hierarchical Neural Networks and Augmented Clustering: A 16PF and CFIT Assessment Approach

A hierarchical neural network was used to predict scores in both Intermediate Programming and C Certification using cognitive and personality assessments. The model, which integrates the Cattell Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT) and the 16 Personality Factors (16PF), achieved a mean accuracy of 95.15% (±1.97%) and a mean loss of 0.2629 across 10-fold cross-validation, significantly outperforming traditional machine learning models that achieved accuracies of only 47-59%, while also assuring its ability to generalize. Beyond predictive modeling, an augmented clustering approach was employed to profile students into performance-based clusters, supported by statistical significance testing through t-tests across high performing and low performing groups. Results revealed key differences between high- and low-performing clusters, such as top-performing students exhibited higher cognitive ability (mean CFIT score = 9.33, p < 0.01), logical reasoning (attr_B = 6.52, p < 0.05), and emotional stability (attr_C = 5.63, p < 0.05), along with lower dominance (attr_E = 3.15, p < 0.05) and impulsiveness (attr_F = 4.15, p < 0.05). This is in comparison to low-performing students, which demonstrated significantly lower cognitive scores (mean CFIT score = 3.00, p < 0.01) and higher dominance (attr_E = 5.62, p < 0.05) and impulsiveness (attr_F = 6.29, p < 0.05). Despite the promising results, it is importance to assert the effectivity of such a model across interdisciplinary fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icett66247.2025.11137068
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting and Analyzing Academic Performance of CITU CCS Students Using Hierarchical Neural Networks and Augmented Clustering: A 16PF and CFIT Assessment Approach

Cherry Lyn C. Sta. Romana, Rufelle Emmanuel Pactol
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Predicting and Analyzing Academic Performance of CITU CCS Students Using Hierarchical Neural Networks and Augmented Clustering: A 16PF and CFIT Assessment Approach

Cherry Lyn C. Sta. Romana, Rufelle Emmanuel Pactol
article en

Abstract

A hierarchical neural network was used to predict scores in both Intermediate Programming and C Certification using cognitive and personality assessments. The model, which integrates the Cattell Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT) and the 16 Personality Factors (16PF), achieved a mean accuracy of 95.15% (±1.97%) and a mean loss of 0.2629 across 10-fold cross-validation, significantly outperforming traditional machine learning models that achieved accuracies of only 47-59%, while also assuring its ability to generalize. Beyond predictive modeling, an augmented clustering approach was employed to profile students into performance-based clusters, supported by statistical significance testing through t-tests across high performing and low performing groups. Results revealed key differences between high- and low-performing clusters, such as top-performing students exhibited higher cognitive ability (mean CFIT score = 9.33, p < 0.01), logical reasoning (attr_B = 6.52, p < 0.05), and emotional stability (attr_C = 5.63, p < 0.05), along with lower dominance (attr_E = 3.15, p < 0.05) and impulsiveness (attr_F = 4.15, p < 0.05). This is in comparison to low-performing students, which demonstrated significantly lower cognitive scores (mean CFIT score = 3.00, p < 0.01) and higher dominance (attr_E = 5.62, p < 0.05) and impulsiveness (attr_F = 6.29, p < 0.05). Despite the promising results, it is importance to assert the effectivity of such a model across interdisciplinary fields.

Cebu Institute of Technology University (PH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.