Tailoring CZTSSe Solar Cell Performance: Comparison of Flexible Molybdenum Foil and Sputtered Molybdenum Back Contacts

Flexible CZTSSe (Cu₂ZnSn(S,Se)₄) solar cells on flexible molybdenum foil (MF) substrates are showing promise for being a candidate for the next-generation large-area and lightweight solar technologies. However, the nature of the back contact continues to be a decisive factor influencing absorber morphology, crystallinity, and the ultimate final device performance. In this work, we provide a comprehensive analysis and comparison of a variety of back contact configurations of flexible and rigid Mo substrates. We analyze four configurations in detail: MF, sputtered Mocoated MF, 10 nm NaF-coated MF, and MoOx-interlayered MF. We compare these with standard rigid devices on sputtered Mo on soda-lime glass (SLG) substrates.The work examines the impact of each back contact on the CZTSSe absorber growth behavior based on grain size, grain distribution, and defect passivation. Furthermore, solar devices are also prepared and examined to find the impact of back contact engineering on the main performance characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/pvsc59419.2025.11132982
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tailoring CZTSSe Solar Cell Performance: Comparison of Flexible Molybdenum Foil and Sputtered Molybdenum Back Contacts

Giorgio Tseberlidis, Elisa Artegiani, Ikram Anefnaf, Alessandro Romeo et al.
1 citations
Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
0.73
article

Tailoring CZTSSe Solar Cell Performance: Comparison of Flexible Molybdenum Foil and Sputtered Molybdenum Back Contacts

Giorgio Tseberlidis, Elisa Artegiani, Ikram Anefnaf, Alessandro Romeo, S. Binetti, Alessandro Veneri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Flexible CZTSSe (Cu₂ZnSn(S,Se)₄) solar cells on flexible molybdenum foil (MF) substrates are showing promise for being a candidate for the next-generation large-area and lightweight solar technologies. However, the nature of the back contact continues to be a decisive factor influencing absorber morphology, crystallinity, and the ultimate final device performance. In this work, we provide a comprehensive analysis and comparison of a variety of back contact configurations of flexible and rigid Mo substrates. We analyze four configurations in detail: MF, sputtered Mocoated MF, 10 nm NaF-coated MF, and MoOx-interlayered MF. We compare these with standard rigid devices on sputtered Mo on soda-lime glass (SLG) substrates.The work examines the impact of each back contact on the CZTSSe absorber growth behavior based on grain size, grain distribution, and defect passivation. Furthermore, solar devices are also prepared and examined to find the impact of back contact engineering on the main performance characteristics.

University of Verona (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tailoring CZTSSe Solar Cell Performance: Comparison of Flexible Molybdenum Foil and Sputtered Molybdenum Back Contacts — Giorgio Tseberlidis, Elisa Artegiani, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS