CLEVER: A Novel Approach for Improving EV Charging Duration and Load Predictions Using Curriculum Learning Approach

Despite advancements in electric vehicle (EV) charging prediction models, existing approaches are suffering from complex charging patterns. The curriculum learning (CL) is a training approach which resembles the natural human learning progression by introducing training samples through different patterns, hence efficiently structuring the learning process. While the CL has been successfully used in other domains, its application in EV charging prediction remains unexploited. In this work, the CL is to be leveraged for the first time to improve the EV charging behavior predictions in both EV charging duration and charging load prediction. A feature-based curriculum learning approach, named CLEVER (Curriculum Learning EV chargER), is proposed for predicting charging session load and duration. CLEVER employs an advanced data stratification mechanism that introduces training samples progressively according to complexity metrics computed from temperature variations, state of charge variations, and temporal patterns. The CLEVER method integrates a CL strategy with a staged schedule mechanism over four neural network architectures: ANN, DNN, LSTM, and GRU. The performances obtained exhibit notable gains, where CL scores 20.9% reduction of Mean Absolute Error for GRU-based forecasting of EV charging duration and 2.2% improvement for DNN-based charging load forecasting. The CLEVER methodology shows considerable improvements in predicting the duration of EV charging, with, as many as 23.0% reductions in Mean Absolute Error with GRU models on Level 1 chargers and a near 20.7% improvement with DNN models on DC Fast Chargers. For EV charging load forecasts, curriculum learning produces consistent, but modest, gains, with improved up to 2.4% with ANN models on DC Fast Chargers and 1.6-2.1% improvements across different neural network architectures. This comprehensive analysis across different charger types, user groups, vehicle models, temperatures, and temporal patterns makes CL a superior approach to enhancing EV charging infrastructure management and grid stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3604342
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLEVER: A Novel Approach for Improving EV Charging Duration and Load Predictions Using Curriculum Learning Approach

Ahmed Fathalla, Ahmad Salah, Esraa Eldesouky, Mahmoud Bekhit
1 citations
IEEE Access
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
0.68
article

CLEVER: A Novel Approach for Improving EV Charging Duration and Load Predictions Using Curriculum Learning Approach

Ahmed Fathalla, Ahmad Salah, Esraa Eldesouky, Mahmoud Bekhit
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite advancements in electric vehicle (EV) charging prediction models, existing approaches are suffering from complex charging patterns. The curriculum learning (CL) is a training approach which resembles the natural human learning progression by introducing training samples through different patterns, hence efficiently structuring the learning process. While the CL has been successfully used in other domains, its application in EV charging prediction remains unexploited. In this work, the CL is to be leveraged for the first time to improve the EV charging behavior predictions in both EV charging duration and charging load prediction. A feature-based curriculum learning approach, named CLEVER (Curriculum Learning EV chargER), is proposed for predicting charging session load and duration. CLEVER employs an advanced data stratification mechanism that introduces training samples progressively according to complexity metrics computed from temperature variations, state of charge variations, and temporal patterns. The CLEVER method integrates a CL strategy with a staged schedule mechanism over four neural network architectures: ANN, DNN, LSTM, and GRU. The performances obtained exhibit notable gains, where CL scores 20.9% reduction of Mean Absolute Error for GRU-based forecasting of EV charging duration and 2.2% improvement for DNN-based charging load forecasting. The CLEVER methodology shows considerable improvements in predicting the duration of EV charging, with, as many as 23.0% reductions in Mean Absolute Error with GRU models on Level 1 chargers and a near 20.7% improvement with DNN models on DC Fast Chargers. For EV charging load forecasts, curriculum learning produces consistent, but modest, gains, with improved up to 2.4% with ANN models on DC Fast Chargers and 1.6-2.1% improvements across different neural network architectures. This comprehensive analysis across different charger types, user groups, vehicle models, temperatures, and temporal patterns makes CL a superior approach to enhancing EV charging infrastructure management and grid stability.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Suez Canal University (EG), Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), College of Applied Sciences, Nizwa (OM), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.