LGBTIQ+ refugees in India: RSD and the implications of legal developments in the country of asylum

Abstract India has a unique dual system where UNHCR is allowed by the Indian government to conduct Refugee Status Determinations for asylum seekers from non-neighbouring countries, including Myanmar, while the government directly manages refugees from neighbouring countries. However, India has not signed the 1951 Refugee Convention, nor formulated domestic asylum laws. While the country has made significant progress in the legal protection of LGBTIQ+ people, the benefit thereof does not extend to those with these intersectional vulnerabilities, such as queer refugees. The deteriorating political environment for refugees in the region and the denial of legal status to remain mean that those who fled their countries to avoid persecution for their identity are unable to articulate their SOGIESC even as exiles. Our article draws upon our experiences of providing legal representation to LGBTIQ+ refugees in India through the UNHCR process, and analyses the protection gaps LGBTIQ+ refugees experience in India.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Refugee Studies
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaf053
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LGBTIQ+ refugees in India: RSD and the implications of legal developments in the country of asylum

Hamsa Vijayaraghavan, Saie Shetye
1 citations
Journal of Refugee Studies
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
4.20
article

LGBTIQ+ refugees in India: RSD and the implications of legal developments in the country of asylum

Hamsa Vijayaraghavan, Saie Shetye
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract India has a unique dual system where UNHCR is allowed by the Indian government to conduct Refugee Status Determinations for asylum seekers from non-neighbouring countries, including Myanmar, while the government directly manages refugees from neighbouring countries. However, India has not signed the 1951 Refugee Convention, nor formulated domestic asylum laws. While the country has made significant progress in the legal protection of LGBTIQ+ people, the benefit thereof does not extend to those with these intersectional vulnerabilities, such as queer refugees. The deteriorating political environment for refugees in the region and the denial of legal status to remain mean that those who fled their countries to avoid persecution for their identity are unable to articulate their SOGIESC even as exiles. Our article draws upon our experiences of providing legal representation to LGBTIQ+ refugees in India through the UNHCR process, and analyses the protection gaps LGBTIQ+ refugees experience in India.

Journal of Refugee Studies
Migration Policy Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

LGBTIQ+ refugees in India: RSD and the implications of legal developments in the country of asylum — Hamsa Vijayaraghavan, Saie Shetye · Journal of Refugee Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS