Ambient Oxygen Concentration Enrichment When Using a Face Mask Connected to the Breathing Circuit Versus a Venturi Device: A Simulation Study
Background The anesthesiology standard of care requires limiting oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) concentration to less than or equal to 30% during monitored anesthetic care for upper chest and head and neck surgery to reduce the fire risk. While Venturi devices are used to regulate O<sub>2</sub> concentration, they generate high flow rates, which may increase O<sub>2</sub> concentration near the face mask. Even small increases of O<sub>2</sub> concentration greater than room air significantly increase combustibility, highlighting the need for careful O<sub>2</sub> delivery strategies. Methods A face mask was attached to a full-body patient simulator. The mask was connected to 1) the breathing circuit via a 15-mm tracheal tube adapter using the anesthesia machine's O<sub>2</sub> blender set at 30%, or 2) the auxiliary O<sub>2</sub> port using a 31% Venturi device. Surgical drapes were placed on intravenous poles ("ether screen") to separate the anesthesia and surgical side. Inflow O<sub>2</sub> flow was 6 L/min for both groups, with the Venturi delivering ≈52 L/min. After room air calibration, ambient O<sub>2</sub> concentrations were measured at three sites on the anesthesia side and three on the surgical side of the drape at no flow and then 15, 30, and 60 minutes after O<sub>2</sub> flow initiation. Experiments were repeated three times. Results The pooled differences in the O<sub>2</sub> concentration increases between the two devices were 0.80% (95% CI 0.53 to 1.07, P<.001) on the surgical side and 2.22% (95% CI 2.02 to 2.42, P<.001) on the anesthesia side of the ether screen. At 60 minutes, the mean (SD) concentrations in the Venturi group were 22.99% (0.31%) on the anesthesia side and 21.72% (0.90%) on the surgical side. Corresponding values in the anesthesia circuit group were 21.07% (0.12%) and 21.00% (0.11%). Conclusions A 31% Venturi device resulted in clinically relevant increases in ambient O<sub>2</sub> concentrations on both sides of the ether screen compared to using the anesthesia machine O<sub>2</sub> blender set at 30%. The differences are substantive because each 1% increase in the ambient O<sub>2</sub> concentration increases the combustion rate of cotton by 15%. The use of a Venturi device to regulate O<sub>2</sub> concentrations in the presence of an ignition source during head and neck surgery is not recommended. We advocate for anesthesia machine manufacturers to provide an integrated O<sub>2</sub> blender for the auxiliary gas outlet of all their products as a fire safety measure.
Authors
- Danielle Bodzin Horn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5698-4614)
- Richard H. Epstein (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8466-3845)
- Joni M. Maga
- Khoa Dang Nguyen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7111-0464)
Institutions
- University of Miami (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cureus
- Published
- 2025-08-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.91195
- Primary Topic
- Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- University of Miami