Habitat Availability, Jurassic and Cretaceous Origins of the Deep‐Bodied Shark Morphotype and the Rise of Pelagic Sharks

Macroevolutionary trends in vertebrate morphology fundamentally shape our understanding of marine ecosystems through deep time. Body form influences interactions between organisms and their environment, dictating their locomotor capabilities and ability to hunt/escape from other species. Sharks (Elasmobranchii: Selachii) have been suggested to broadly exhibit two discrete body forms: one 'shallow-bodied' form associated with slow-moving benthic species and a 'deep-bodied' form typified by highly active pelagic taxa. Until now, no study has addressed the validity or evolution of these body forms in a phylogenetic framework. Hence, we lack understanding of when, why and how the body forms observed in extant species originally evolved. In this study, we reconstruct the evolutionary history of shark body form and provide statistical evidence to suggest three broadly discrete body forms among extant species. We find support for a benthic origin of sharks, with four discrete transitions to a pelagic-type morphology occurring during the Jurassic and Cretaceous. Increased habitat availability during this time, driven by a combination of elevated sea temperature, eustatic sea level rise, continental fragmentation and diversification trends of actinopterygians and marine reptiles, could have facilitated the colonisation of the pelagic realm by Mesozoic sharks and the repeated independent evolution of body form consistent with extant pelagic species. We also propose that habitat availability and its taphonomic consequences may explain discordance between origination times suggested by molecular phylogenies and the fossil record.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72082
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Habitat Availability, Jurassic and Cretaceous Origins of the Deep‐Bodied Shark Morphotype and the Rise of Pelagic Sharks

Julia Türtscher, Scott G. Seamone, Patrick L. Jambura, Phillip C. Sternes et al.
3 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
6.94
article

Habitat Availability, Jurassic and Cretaceous Origins of the Deep‐Bodied Shark Morphotype and the Rise of Pelagic Sharks

Julia Türtscher, Scott G. Seamone, Patrick L. Jambura, Phillip C. Sternes, Joel Harrison Gayford, Kenshu Shimada
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Macroevolutionary trends in vertebrate morphology fundamentally shape our understanding of marine ecosystems through deep time. Body form influences interactions between organisms and their environment, dictating their locomotor capabilities and ability to hunt/escape from other species. Sharks (Elasmobranchii: Selachii) have been suggested to broadly exhibit two discrete body forms: one 'shallow-bodied' form associated with slow-moving benthic species and a 'deep-bodied' form typified by highly active pelagic taxa. Until now, no study has addressed the validity or evolution of these body forms in a phylogenetic framework. Hence, we lack understanding of when, why and how the body forms observed in extant species originally evolved. In this study, we reconstruct the evolutionary history of shark body form and provide statistical evidence to suggest three broadly discrete body forms among extant species. We find support for a benthic origin of sharks, with four discrete transitions to a pelagic-type morphology occurring during the Jurassic and Cretaceous. Increased habitat availability during this time, driven by a combination of elevated sea temperature, eustatic sea level rise, continental fragmentation and diversification trends of actinopterygians and marine reptiles, could have facilitated the colonisation of the pelagic realm by Mesozoic sharks and the repeated independent evolution of body form consistent with extant pelagic species. We also propose that habitat availability and its taphonomic consequences may explain discordance between origination times suggested by molecular phylogenies and the fossil record.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(9)
DePaul University (US), Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), University of Vienna (AT), SeaWorld Entertainment (US), Field Museum of Natural History (US), Bahamas Marine Mammal Research Organisation (BS), James Cook University (AU), College of The Bahamas (BS), Fort Hays State University (US)
James Cook University, Austrian Science Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
6.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.