Publier ses actes de colloque en ≈ 12 mois : guide à l’intention des éditeur·trice·s étudiant·e·s

The publication of student conference proceedings represents a significant challenge, both logistically and methodologically, and remains underdocumented in academic circles. This text draws on the editorial experience of the 2024 edition of the Journées de linguistique (JDL), whose proceedings were published in approximately 13 months–a timeframe comparable to those observed between 1987 and 2011, which had ceased to be the norm in recent years due to structural challenges. After outlining specific issues inherent to student-led editions (lack of training, team turnover, absence of a lasting framework), we offer a synthetic post mortem of the evolution of the JDL proceedings from 1987 to 2024. Building on this experience, we outline a concrete editorial model, tested in 2024, structured around feasibility and four interdependent pillars: people (roles and responsibilities), processes (planning, evaluation, coordination), products (editorial tools and standardized templates), and technologies (collaborative platforms, tracking systems). While not claiming to provide a universal solution, this approach seeks to share adaptable and reproducible guidelines that may support future JDL student teams or other comparable editorial projects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Actes des Journées de linguistique
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70637/m5z63833
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Publier ses actes de colloque en ≈ 12 mois : guide à l’intention des éditeur·trice·s étudiant·e·s

Gabriel Frazer-McKee, Linda Wong, Nicolas Gignac
Actes des Journées de linguistique
Healthcare Systems and Practices
article

Publier ses actes de colloque en ≈ 12 mois : guide à l’intention des éditeur·trice·s étudiant·e·s

Gabriel Frazer-McKee, Linda Wong, Nicolas Gignac
article en

Abstract

The publication of student conference proceedings represents a significant challenge, both logistically and methodologically, and remains underdocumented in academic circles. This text draws on the editorial experience of the 2024 edition of the Journées de linguistique (JDL), whose proceedings were published in approximately 13 months–a timeframe comparable to those observed between 1987 and 2011, which had ceased to be the norm in recent years due to structural challenges. After outlining specific issues inherent to student-led editions (lack of training, team turnover, absence of a lasting framework), we offer a synthetic post mortem of the evolution of the JDL proceedings from 1987 to 2024. Building on this experience, we outline a concrete editorial model, tested in 2024, structured around feasibility and four interdependent pillars: people (roles and responsibilities), processes (planning, evaluation, coordination), products (editorial tools and standardized templates), and technologies (collaborative platforms, tracking systems). While not claiming to provide a universal solution, this approach seeks to share adaptable and reproducible guidelines that may support future JDL student teams or other comparable editorial projects.

Actes des Journées de linguistiqueVol. 1
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Healthcare Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.