Association between diabetes mellitus and adhesive capsulitis of shoulder: A 2-sample Mendelian randomization study

The objective of this study was to investigate whether there is a causal relationship between diabetes mellitus and adhesive capsulitis of shoulder (ACS). A 2-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was performed using publicly available genome-wide association study statistics. To determine whether diabetes was causally associated with ACS, 2 datasets on diabetes among Europeans from the genome-wide association studies catalogue and ACS among Europeans from FinnGen were extracted and the data were analyzed using inverse variance-weighted, Mendelian randomization 123456123451231 Egger regression, weighted medians, weighted modes and simple modes. Sensitivity analysis and heterogeneity analysis were then used to assess the stability and reliability of the results. Mendelian randomization analysis showed causality between type 1 diabetes and ACS (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.85-1.11, P < .05). No significant causal effect of type 2 diabetes on ACS (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.95-1.13, P = .414). The Cochran Q test showed only a low level of heterogeneity between the type 1 diabetes and ACS data sets (Q = 106.0431, P = .045). Not heterogeneous between type 2 diabetes and ACS. Egger-intercept and funnel plots for data did not show multidirectional and asymmetry at the gene level. The study was the first to find a causal association between type 1 diabetes and the risk of developing ACS in European people. No cause-and-effect genetic link was found between type 2 diabetes and shoulder adhesive capsulitis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000044119
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between diabetes mellitus and adhesive capsulitis of shoulder: A 2-sample Mendelian randomization study

Jing Lou, Weizhong Huangfu, Wenqiang Li, Dezhi Han
Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Association between diabetes mellitus and adhesive capsulitis of shoulder: A 2-sample Mendelian randomization study

Jing Lou, Weizhong Huangfu, Wenqiang Li, Dezhi Han
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate whether there is a causal relationship between diabetes mellitus and adhesive capsulitis of shoulder (ACS). A 2-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was performed using publicly available genome-wide association study statistics. To determine whether diabetes was causally associated with ACS, 2 datasets on diabetes among Europeans from the genome-wide association studies catalogue and ACS among Europeans from FinnGen were extracted and the data were analyzed using inverse variance-weighted, Mendelian randomization 123456123451231 Egger regression, weighted medians, weighted modes and simple modes. Sensitivity analysis and heterogeneity analysis were then used to assess the stability and reliability of the results. Mendelian randomization analysis showed causality between type 1 diabetes and ACS (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.85-1.11, P < .05). No significant causal effect of type 2 diabetes on ACS (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.95-1.13, P = .414). The Cochran Q test showed only a low level of heterogeneity between the type 1 diabetes and ACS data sets (Q = 106.0431, P = .045). Not heterogeneous between type 2 diabetes and ACS. Egger-intercept and funnel plots for data did not show multidirectional and asymmetry at the gene level. The study was the first to find a causal association between type 1 diabetes and the risk of developing ACS in European people. No cause-and-effect genetic link was found between type 2 diabetes and shoulder adhesive capsulitis.

MedicineVol. 104(35)
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.