Reconsidering ICSID in the Context of Global Just Transitions

Abstract One global institution that has been largely neglected in the literature on just transitions is the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the most utilized forum for arbitrating disputes between foreign investors and states. ICSID tribunals play a role in determining the distribution of costs and benefits of the energy transition. This article develops a framework for understanding this role and surveys disputes that concern government measures aimed at restricting the development of fossil fuel reserves, accelerating the retirement of coal power plants, extracting greater value from critical mineral deposits, and altering incentive schemes for renewable energy. It is concluded that there is potential for ICSID tribunals to shift financial burdens associated with the energy transition from the private to the public sphere and from the Global North to the Global South. To facilitate just transitions, governments should reconsider their support for ICSID.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Politics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.8
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering ICSID in the Context of Global Just Transitions

Kyla Tienhaara
Global Environmental Politics
Human Rights and Development
article

Reconsidering ICSID in the Context of Global Just Transitions

Kyla Tienhaara
article en

Abstract

Abstract One global institution that has been largely neglected in the literature on just transitions is the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the most utilized forum for arbitrating disputes between foreign investors and states. ICSID tribunals play a role in determining the distribution of costs and benefits of the energy transition. This article develops a framework for understanding this role and surveys disputes that concern government measures aimed at restricting the development of fossil fuel reserves, accelerating the retirement of coal power plants, extracting greater value from critical mineral deposits, and altering incentive schemes for renewable energy. It is concluded that there is potential for ICSID tribunals to shift financial burdens associated with the energy transition from the private to the public sphere and from the Global North to the Global South. To facilitate just transitions, governments should reconsider their support for ICSID.

Global Environmental PoliticsVol. 25(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.