Negotiating Just Transition at the UNFCCC

Abstract This article argues that the Global South’s whole-systems vision of just transition was undermined by the Global North at the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties 28 (COP28) in Dubai. Negotiations of the Work Program for Just Transition Pathways (WPJTP) were fraught, with those in the G20 making a strong case for a reductionist scope of just transition focusing on labor and the energy sector, and the G77+China, supported by climate-vulnerable nations, calling for a whole-systems approach focused on multiple overlapping conceptions of justice and driving forward systemic change. By analyzing negotiation drafts and drawing on direct participant observation, the article argues that entrenched power dynamics saw a whole-systems vision of just transition all but erased by the time COP28 had concluded. The article concludes with some reflections on why this spells trouble for the future of just transition under the UNFCCC.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Politics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating Just Transition at the UNFCCC

Alix Dietzel
1 citations
Global Environmental Politics
International Development and Aid
3.45
article

Negotiating Just Transition at the UNFCCC

Alix Dietzel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article argues that the Global South’s whole-systems vision of just transition was undermined by the Global North at the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties 28 (COP28) in Dubai. Negotiations of the Work Program for Just Transition Pathways (WPJTP) were fraught, with those in the G20 making a strong case for a reductionist scope of just transition focusing on labor and the energy sector, and the G77+China, supported by climate-vulnerable nations, calling for a whole-systems approach focused on multiple overlapping conceptions of justice and driving forward systemic change. By analyzing negotiation drafts and drawing on direct participant observation, the article argues that entrenched power dynamics saw a whole-systems vision of just transition all but erased by the time COP28 had concluded. The article concludes with some reflections on why this spells trouble for the future of just transition under the UNFCCC.

Global Environmental PoliticsVol. 25(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
International Development and Aid
3.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.