IUC24398-91 Functional and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in obese men: a matched-pair analysis

Abstract Background Obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) is a growing global health concern and presents technical challenges during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Despite increasing prevalence, limited data exist on surgical and oncological outcomes of RARP in severely obese patients, especially in the United Kingdom. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of RARP in this population using a matched-pairs analysis. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 1,273 patients undergoing RARP between January 2018 and June 2021. Forty-three patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 were matched 1:1 with patients having BMI < 35 kg/m2 based on PSA, Gleason grade, clinical stage, D’Amico risk, and nerve-sparing status. Perioperative outcomes, 1-year continence rates, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were assessed. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon rank-sum and logistic regression (P < .05 considered significant). Results Both groups were comparable in PSA, tumor stage, grade, and nerve-sparing, though the higher BMI group was younger (P < .001). No significant differences were observed in console time (P = .20), blood loss (P > .90), complications, or BCR at 1-year follow-up (P > .90). Continence rates at 1 year were equivalent across both cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression identified age (P < .001) and nerve-sparing extent (P = .038) as independent predictors of continence recovery; BMI was not a significant factor. Conclusions RARP in patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 is safe and yields similar functional and oncological outcomes compared to non-obese counterparts when performed in experienced centers. High BMI alone should not exclude patients from surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf248.031
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IUC24398-91 Functional and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in obese men: a matched-pair analysis

Constantinos Adamou, Danielle Whiting, Sabina Dranova, Gerasimos Frajkoulis et al.
The Oncologist
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

IUC24398-91 Functional and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in obese men: a matched-pair analysis

Constantinos Adamou, Danielle Whiting, Sabina Dranova, Gerasimos Frajkoulis, Dimitrios Papanikolou, Mark Broe, Sergio Uribe, Matthew J.A. Perry, Danny Darlington Carbin, H. E. Harrison
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) is a growing global health concern and presents technical challenges during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Despite increasing prevalence, limited data exist on surgical and oncological outcomes of RARP in severely obese patients, especially in the United Kingdom. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of RARP in this population using a matched-pairs analysis. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 1,273 patients undergoing RARP between January 2018 and June 2021. Forty-three patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 were matched 1:1 with patients having BMI < 35 kg/m2 based on PSA, Gleason grade, clinical stage, D’Amico risk, and nerve-sparing status. Perioperative outcomes, 1-year continence rates, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were assessed. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon rank-sum and logistic regression (P < .05 considered significant). Results Both groups were comparable in PSA, tumor stage, grade, and nerve-sparing, though the higher BMI group was younger (P < .001). No significant differences were observed in console time (P = .20), blood loss (P > .90), complications, or BCR at 1-year follow-up (P > .90). Continence rates at 1 year were equivalent across both cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression identified age (P < .001) and nerve-sparing extent (P = .038) as independent predictors of continence recovery; BMI was not a significant factor. Conclusions RARP in patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 is safe and yields similar functional and oncological outcomes compared to non-obese counterparts when performed in experienced centers. High BMI alone should not exclude patients from surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer.

The OncologistVol. 30(Supplement_1)
Royal Surrey County Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.