Clinical Management of Gingival Recessions with or Without Cervical Lesions: A Decisional Scheme Proposal

<b>Background</b>: Treatment of gingival recessions starts from an accurate diagnosis considering both periodontal tissue status and adjacent exposed dental tissues. Based on current scientific evidence and the authors' clinical experience, a decisional scheme has been proposed for the management of gingival recession defects, with or without non-carious cervical lesions, taking into account gingival thickness and interproximal attachment levels. To illustrate its practical application, a series of representative clinical cases is presented, documenting the rationale and outcomes of the therapeutic decisions. <b>Methods</b>: According to the 2017 World Workshop Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions, the gingival recession defect classifications have been used to build up a decision-making therapeutic process. Combined periodontal and restorative treatments in presence or absence of dental lesions have been performed. <b>Results</b>: In case of an identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) with or without non-carious cervical lesions (class A+ and class A-, respectively) and absence of interproximal attachment loss (RT1), flap approaches alone or in combination with connective tissue graft (CTG) were suggested. In case of an unidentifiable CEJ without cervical lesion (class B-), flap approaches alone were proposed in presence of adequate residual keratinized tissue (KT) and absence of interproximal attachment loss (RT1); if KT is extremely reduced, flap approaches + CTG may be performed. If the unidentifiable CEJ is associated with cervical lesions involving both root and crown surfaces (class B+), the combined restorative-periodontal treatment results as the most indicated approach. The adjunctive use of CTG should be also considered in presence of interproximal attachment loss (RT2 and RT3) and reduced gingival thickness (<1 mm). <b>Conclusions</b>: The proposed decisional scheme could be useful to address the clinicians during the decision-making process in the treatment of gingival recessions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176134
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Management of Gingival Recessions with or Without Cervical Lesions: A Decisional Scheme Proposal

Stefano Speroni, Roberto Rotundo, Luca Coccoluto
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Clinical Management of Gingival Recessions with or Without Cervical Lesions: A Decisional Scheme Proposal

Stefano Speroni, Roberto Rotundo, Luca Coccoluto
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Treatment of gingival recessions starts from an accurate diagnosis considering both periodontal tissue status and adjacent exposed dental tissues. Based on current scientific evidence and the authors' clinical experience, a decisional scheme has been proposed for the management of gingival recession defects, with or without non-carious cervical lesions, taking into account gingival thickness and interproximal attachment levels. To illustrate its practical application, a series of representative clinical cases is presented, documenting the rationale and outcomes of the therapeutic decisions. <b>Methods</b>: According to the 2017 World Workshop Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions, the gingival recession defect classifications have been used to build up a decision-making therapeutic process. Combined periodontal and restorative treatments in presence or absence of dental lesions have been performed. <b>Results</b>: In case of an identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) with or without non-carious cervical lesions (class A+ and class A-, respectively) and absence of interproximal attachment loss (RT1), flap approaches alone or in combination with connective tissue graft (CTG) were suggested. In case of an unidentifiable CEJ without cervical lesion (class B-), flap approaches alone were proposed in presence of adequate residual keratinized tissue (KT) and absence of interproximal attachment loss (RT1); if KT is extremely reduced, flap approaches + CTG may be performed. If the unidentifiable CEJ is associated with cervical lesions involving both root and crown surfaces (class B+), the combined restorative-periodontal treatment results as the most indicated approach. The adjunctive use of CTG should be also considered in presence of interproximal attachment loss (RT2 and RT3) and reduced gingival thickness (<1 mm). <b>Conclusions</b>: The proposed decisional scheme could be useful to address the clinicians during the decision-making process in the treatment of gingival recessions.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(17)
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.