Forty-five years of removal campaigns for feral ungulates reveal strategies for success and future directions

Abstract Feral or invasive ungulates (hereafter: feral ungulates) exist worldwide, and their ability to thrive threatens biodiversity, degrades ecosystems, and causes damage to agriculture and properties. Strategies for removing feral ungulates from their introduced insular and mainland ranges have varied greatly, successes have been difficult, and the need is increasing. We reviewed published scientific literature on feral ungulate eradication and maximum control campaigns during 1978–2023 to identify practices that led to greater success. Of 54 campaigns, 32 (59%) reported success. Most campaigns focused on feral swine (61%; Sus scrofa ) or feral goats (24%; Capra hircus ). The average duration of a campaign was 61 months and cost an average of $1.9 m ($USD 2024) or $636/km 2 /month. The most important components for success included ensuring adequate funding was secured for the campaign ($0.5–1 million/km 2 is recommended) and population recovery or reinvasion were minimized. The frequency of campaigns has increased during the last 45 years; however, the areas worked (km 2 ), monthly durations, removal techniques used, funding, and ultimately the rates of success have not changed. A lack of increasing success for larger and more complex campaigns indicated that modernization of technologies for population control has been minimal, and larger breakthroughs are needed. Safe and effective toxicants and sterilants may provide those advances if developed. Lessons learned from campaigns indicate that pilot testing control methods prior to initiating full campaigns may help to alleviate uncertainties, produce more reliable plans, and help inform the biology of the animals being targeted for removal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Invasions
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-025-03652-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forty-five years of removal campaigns for feral ungulates reveal strategies for success and future directions

Kim M. Pepin, Travis Guerrant, Scott F. Beckerman, Seth M. Cook et al.
1 citations
Biological Invasions
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Forty-five years of removal campaigns for feral ungulates reveal strategies for success and future directions

Kim M. Pepin, Travis Guerrant, Scott F. Beckerman, Seth M. Cook, Ingrid A. Messer, Kurt C. VerCauteren, Nathan P. Snow, Abigail Pagels, Keely J. Kohen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Feral or invasive ungulates (hereafter: feral ungulates) exist worldwide, and their ability to thrive threatens biodiversity, degrades ecosystems, and causes damage to agriculture and properties. Strategies for removing feral ungulates from their introduced insular and mainland ranges have varied greatly, successes have been difficult, and the need is increasing. We reviewed published scientific literature on feral ungulate eradication and maximum control campaigns during 1978–2023 to identify practices that led to greater success. Of 54 campaigns, 32 (59%) reported success. Most campaigns focused on feral swine (61%; Sus scrofa ) or feral goats (24%; Capra hircus ). The average duration of a campaign was 61 months and cost an average of $1.9 m ($USD 2024) or $636/km 2 /month. The most important components for success included ensuring adequate funding was secured for the campaign ($0.5–1 million/km 2 is recommended) and population recovery or reinvasion were minimized. The frequency of campaigns has increased during the last 45 years; however, the areas worked (km 2 ), monthly durations, removal techniques used, funding, and ultimately the rates of success have not changed. A lack of increasing success for larger and more complex campaigns indicated that modernization of technologies for population control has been minimal, and larger breakthroughs are needed. Safe and effective toxicants and sterilants may provide those advances if developed. Lessons learned from campaigns indicate that pilot testing control methods prior to initiating full campaigns may help to alleviate uncertainties, produce more reliable plans, and help inform the biology of the animals being targeted for removal.

Biological InvasionsVol. 27(9)
Life Services (United States) (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.