Exact power and sample size in clinical trials with two co-primary binary endpoints

Binary endpoints are used widely to evaluate treatment effects during clinical trials. Although clinical trials in many therapeutic areas evaluate a single binary endpoint as the primary endpoint, clinical trials in certain therapeutic areas require two co-primary binary endpoints to evaluate treatment benefit multi-dimensionally. We consider the situation in which evidence of effects on both co-primary endpoints is necessary to conclude that the intervention is effective, which differs from approaches by which significance on at least one endpoint is sufficient for trial success. When designing clinical trials with two co-primary binary endpoints, consideration of correlation between the endpoints can increase trial power and consequently reduce the required sample size, leading to improved efficiency. For clinical trials with two co-primary binary endpoints, methods for calculating power and sample size have been proposed, but they are based on approximations or require Monte Carlo integration. Alternatively, we propose methods for calculating the exact power and sample size in clinical trials with two co-primary binary endpoints. The proposed methods are useful for any statistical test for binary endpoints. Numerical investigation under various scenarios demonstrated that our proposed methods can incorporate consideration of the correlation between two co-primary binary endpoints in sample size calculation, thereby allowing the required sample size to be reduced. We demonstrate that the exact power for the required sample size calculated using our proposed method is approximately equal to target power. Finally, we present application of our proposed methods to a clinical trial of relapsing or refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802251368697
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exact power and sample size in clinical trials with two co-primary binary endpoints

Gosuke Homma, Takuma Yoshida
1 links
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
article

Exact power and sample size in clinical trials with two co-primary binary endpoints

Gosuke Homma, Takuma Yoshida
article en

Abstract

Binary endpoints are used widely to evaluate treatment effects during clinical trials. Although clinical trials in many therapeutic areas evaluate a single binary endpoint as the primary endpoint, clinical trials in certain therapeutic areas require two co-primary binary endpoints to evaluate treatment benefit multi-dimensionally. We consider the situation in which evidence of effects on both co-primary endpoints is necessary to conclude that the intervention is effective, which differs from approaches by which significance on at least one endpoint is sufficient for trial success. When designing clinical trials with two co-primary binary endpoints, consideration of correlation between the endpoints can increase trial power and consequently reduce the required sample size, leading to improved efficiency. For clinical trials with two co-primary binary endpoints, methods for calculating power and sample size have been proposed, but they are based on approximations or require Monte Carlo integration. Alternatively, we propose methods for calculating the exact power and sample size in clinical trials with two co-primary binary endpoints. The proposed methods are useful for any statistical test for binary endpoints. Numerical investigation under various scenarios demonstrated that our proposed methods can incorporate consideration of the correlation between two co-primary binary endpoints in sample size calculation, thereby allowing the required sample size to be reduced. We demonstrate that the exact power for the required sample size calculated using our proposed method is approximately equal to target power. Finally, we present application of our proposed methods to a clinical trial of relapsing or refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

Statistical Methods in Medical ResearchVol. 34(11)
Kagoshima University (JP), Astellas Pharma (Japan) (JP), Astellas Pharma (United Kingdom) (GB)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.