THE LEGAL NATURE AND PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENSES IN THE LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS WITH THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

This article is dedicated to a comprehensive study of the legal nature and principles of administrative liability for environmental offenses in the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, with a comparative legal analysis of the legal system of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Environmental offenses are considered by the author as a special category of illegal and socially dangerous acts that violate environmental law and order, cause damage to the environment, and create a threat to sustainable development. Administrative liability in this area serves as the most important form of public legal influence aimed at preventing harmful actions, ensuring the restoration of the violated legal balance, and protecting citizens’ rights to a favorable environment. The article details the key principles of administrative liability, including legality, fairness, humanism, individualization of punishment, inevitability of responsibility, proportionality, publicity, and preventive orientation. Comparative analysis with the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan reveals a higher level of detail in legal norms, institutional elaboration, and application of procedural guarantees, which serves as a basis for formulating proposals for improving the Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Administrative Liability. Special attention is paid to the characteristics of the specific features of legal regulation of environmental offenses: the composition of offenses, the range of subjects, the types of sanctions, the mechanisms for compensation for damages, and the means of legal protection. The conducted comparative legal approach, based on the analysis of national and foreign experience, allows for the identification of general trends in the development of the institution of administrative liability and the disclosure of differences in the degree of detail of legal norms, institutional support, and procedural guarantees, which is of practical importance for the formation of an effective environmental protection system in Uzbekistan..

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
jurisprudence
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.jurisprudence.5.4./emmz7616
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE LEGAL NATURE AND PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENSES IN THE LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS WITH THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

Aigul Otaubayeva
jurisprudence
Environmental law and policy
article

THE LEGAL NATURE AND PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENSES IN THE LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS WITH THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

Aigul Otaubayeva
article en

Abstract

This article is dedicated to a comprehensive study of the legal nature and principles of administrative liability for environmental offenses in the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, with a comparative legal analysis of the legal system of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Environmental offenses are considered by the author as a special category of illegal and socially dangerous acts that violate environmental law and order, cause damage to the environment, and create a threat to sustainable development. Administrative liability in this area serves as the most important form of public legal influence aimed at preventing harmful actions, ensuring the restoration of the violated legal balance, and protecting citizens’ rights to a favorable environment. The article details the key principles of administrative liability, including legality, fairness, humanism, individualization of punishment, inevitability of responsibility, proportionality, publicity, and preventive orientation. Comparative analysis with the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan reveals a higher level of detail in legal norms, institutional elaboration, and application of procedural guarantees, which serves as a basis for formulating proposals for improving the Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Administrative Liability. Special attention is paid to the characteristics of the specific features of legal regulation of environmental offenses: the composition of offenses, the range of subjects, the types of sanctions, the mechanisms for compensation for damages, and the means of legal protection. The conducted comparative legal approach, based on the analysis of national and foreign experience, allows for the identification of general trends in the development of the institution of administrative liability and the disclosure of differences in the degree of detail of legal norms, institutional support, and procedural guarantees, which is of practical importance for the formation of an effective environmental protection system in Uzbekistan..

jurisprudenceVol. 5(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE LEGAL NATURE AND PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENSES IN THE LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS WITH THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN — Aigul Otaubayeva · jurisprudence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS