Accounting for numerical-relativity calibration uncertainty in gravitational-wave modeling and inference

The increasing sensitivity of current and upcoming gravitational-wave (GW) detectors poses stringent requirements on the accuracy of the GW models used for data analysis. If these requirements are not met, systematic errors could dominate over statistical uncertainties, hindering our ability to extract astrophysical and cosmological information, and conduct precise tests of general relativity. In this work, we present a novel method to mitigate the impact of waveform-systematic errors, by incorporating and marginalizing over waveform-uncertainty estimates, which are modeled as probability distributions for the numerical-relativity calibration parameters of effective-one-body waveform models. By analyzing simulated GW signals of loud “golden” binary-black-hole systems, we show that our method significantly reduces biases in the recovered parameters, highlighting its potential to improve the robustness of GW parameter estimation with upcoming observing runs and next-generation ground-based facilities, such as the Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/5kbh-83k7
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting for numerical-relativity calibration uncertainty in gravitational-wave modeling and inference

Lorenzo Pompili, Alessandra Buonanno, M. Pürrer
6 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
6.93
article

Accounting for numerical-relativity calibration uncertainty in gravitational-wave modeling and inference

Lorenzo Pompili, Alessandra Buonanno, M. Pürrer
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The increasing sensitivity of current and upcoming gravitational-wave (GW) detectors poses stringent requirements on the accuracy of the GW models used for data analysis. If these requirements are not met, systematic errors could dominate over statistical uncertainties, hindering our ability to extract astrophysical and cosmological information, and conduct precise tests of general relativity. In this work, we present a novel method to mitigate the impact of waveform-systematic errors, by incorporating and marginalizing over waveform-uncertainty estimates, which are modeled as probability distributions for the numerical-relativity calibration parameters of effective-one-body waveform models. By analyzing simulated GW signals of loud “golden” binary-black-hole systems, we show that our method significantly reduces biases in the recovered parameters, highlighting its potential to improve the robustness of GW parameter estimation with upcoming observing runs and next-generation ground-based facilities, such as the Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(4)
University of Rhode Island (US), Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (DE), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Science Foundation, National Research Foundation, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Academia Sinica, National Research Foundation of Korea, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, National Science and Technology Council, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Australian Research Council, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
6.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.