A framework for green space equity in central business districts: Exposure assessment and comparative analysis for office workers across global cities

Urban green spaces (UGS) are vital for well-being, yet equitable access within high-density Central Business Districts (CBDs) remains critically understudied, despite acute health needs of office workers facing spatiotemporal constraints. This study addresses this gap by developing a novel, CBD-specific framework to assess UGS exposure and equity across five global CBDs (Shenzhen, Singapore, Melbourne, Tokyo, New York). This framework integrates: (1) An improved Gaussian Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (GA2SFCA) model quantifying daytime green exposure potential through NDVI-weighted supply and CBD-specific demand (derived from floor-area ratios), (2) A regional per capita exposure metric combining accessibility, quantity, and quality, and (3) Equity diagnostics using Gini coefficients, Lorenz curves, and bivariate local Moran's I. We apply this framework to five global CBDs (Shenzhen, Singapore, Melbourne, Tokyo, New York), revealing: (1) Significant exposure disparities: Shenzhen (highest) > Singapore > Melbourne > Tokyo > New York (lowest); (2) Equity variations: Lower inequality in Shenzhen (Gini = 0.33), Singapore (0.32), and Melbourne (0.29) vs. Tokyo (0.38) and New York (0.41); (3) Universal supply-demand mismatches via spatial clustering. This comparative analysis demonstrates how divergent urban policies yield distinct equity outcomes, with Shenzhen and Singapore offering models for effective CBD greening. Our framework provides planners with a transferable tool to advance environmental justice for high-density workplace populations. It advances beyond residential-focused models by capturing workplace-specific exposure dynamics. • CBD-specific equity framework: GA2SFCA model adapted for office workers' constraints. • Policy-driven exposure disparities: Shenzhen > Singapore > Melbourne > Tokyo > Manhattan. • Gini 0.29–0.41: Shenzhen & Singapore lead via micro-greening strategies. • 30–40 % of CBD office workers face green deficits, requiring interventions. • Transferable tool advances SDG 11 by diagnosing green injustice in CBDs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106397
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for green space equity in central business districts: Exposure assessment and comparative analysis for office workers across global cities

Wei Huang, Zhonghua Gou, Jian Liu, Xiaohuan Xie
1 citations
Cities
Urban Green Space and Health
1.20
article

A framework for green space equity in central business districts: Exposure assessment and comparative analysis for office workers across global cities

Wei Huang, Zhonghua Gou, Jian Liu, Xiaohuan Xie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Urban green spaces (UGS) are vital for well-being, yet equitable access within high-density Central Business Districts (CBDs) remains critically understudied, despite acute health needs of office workers facing spatiotemporal constraints. This study addresses this gap by developing a novel, CBD-specific framework to assess UGS exposure and equity across five global CBDs (Shenzhen, Singapore, Melbourne, Tokyo, New York). This framework integrates: (1) An improved Gaussian Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (GA2SFCA) model quantifying daytime green exposure potential through NDVI-weighted supply and CBD-specific demand (derived from floor-area ratios), (2) A regional per capita exposure metric combining accessibility, quantity, and quality, and (3) Equity diagnostics using Gini coefficients, Lorenz curves, and bivariate local Moran's I. We apply this framework to five global CBDs (Shenzhen, Singapore, Melbourne, Tokyo, New York), revealing: (1) Significant exposure disparities: Shenzhen (highest) > Singapore > Melbourne > Tokyo > New York (lowest); (2) Equity variations: Lower inequality in Shenzhen (Gini = 0.33), Singapore (0.32), and Melbourne (0.29) vs. Tokyo (0.38) and New York (0.41); (3) Universal supply-demand mismatches via spatial clustering. This comparative analysis demonstrates how divergent urban policies yield distinct equity outcomes, with Shenzhen and Singapore offering models for effective CBD greening. Our framework provides planners with a transferable tool to advance environmental justice for high-density workplace populations. It advances beyond residential-focused models by capturing workplace-specific exposure dynamics. • CBD-specific equity framework: GA2SFCA model adapted for office workers' constraints. • Policy-driven exposure disparities: Shenzhen > Singapore > Melbourne > Tokyo > Manhattan. • Gini 0.29–0.41: Shenzhen & Singapore lead via micro-greening strategies. • 30–40 % of CBD office workers face green deficits, requiring interventions. • Transferable tool advances SDG 11 by diagnosing green injustice in CBDs.

CitiesVol. 167
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shenzhen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Urban Green Space and Health
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.