RESILIENCE DURING WARTIME: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLINICAL AND NON-CLINICAL POPULATIONS

Objective. The lack of research on resilience in individuals with mental disorders, particularly in the context of war, led to the current study. The objective was to examine mental health and resilience of civilians with mental disorders during wartime, in comparison to a non-clinical sample. Methods. Total sample of 101 people contained 49 participants diagnosed with mental disorders. In addition to the Sociodemographic questionnaire a list of diagnostic scales was offered in order to comprehensively assess resilience: CD-RISC-10, Hardiness Survey, SWLS, MHAI, IUS-12. Statistical analyses included independent sample comparison, correlation analysis, and comparison of correlations between groups. Conclusions. Both groups showed relatively similar scores across most scales, however, the associations between measured items varies between groups. Further research is required to check the assumption that individuals with mental disorders may conceptualize and self-assess the given constructs differently.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kyiv journal of modern psychology and psychotherapy
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48020/mppj.2025.01.10
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RESILIENCE DURING WARTIME: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLINICAL AND NON-CLINICAL POPULATIONS

Kseniia Shyrokova, Yevheniia Ivanova
Kyiv journal of modern psychology and psychotherapy
Resilience and Mental Health
article

RESILIENCE DURING WARTIME: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLINICAL AND NON-CLINICAL POPULATIONS

Kseniia Shyrokova, Yevheniia Ivanova
article en

Abstract

Objective. The lack of research on resilience in individuals with mental disorders, particularly in the context of war, led to the current study. The objective was to examine mental health and resilience of civilians with mental disorders during wartime, in comparison to a non-clinical sample. Methods. Total sample of 101 people contained 49 participants diagnosed with mental disorders. In addition to the Sociodemographic questionnaire a list of diagnostic scales was offered in order to comprehensively assess resilience: CD-RISC-10, Hardiness Survey, SWLS, MHAI, IUS-12. Statistical analyses included independent sample comparison, correlation analysis, and comparison of correlations between groups. Conclusions. Both groups showed relatively similar scores across most scales, however, the associations between measured items varies between groups. Further research is required to check the assumption that individuals with mental disorders may conceptualize and self-assess the given constructs differently.

Kyiv journal of modern psychology and psychotherapyVol. 9
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RESILIENCE DURING WARTIME: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLINICAL AND NON-CLINICAL POPULATIONS — Kseniia Shyrokova, Yevheniia Ivanova · Kyiv journal of modern psychology and psychotherapy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS