Sonographic assessment of uterine scar thickness and associated factors among pregnant women with previous caesarean sections at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania

Background: Uterine scar thickness has a practical application on the safe mode of delivery for pregnant woman with previous cesarean section (CS) lower uterine segment (LUS) scar. The study aimed to assess sonographic uterine scar thickness and associated factors among pregnant women with previous CS at a tertiary hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional analytical study was carried out at a tertiary hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania that included pregnant women with previous CS at term (≥ 36 weeks of gestation). Transabdominal obstetric ultrasound was performed. A uterine scar thickness was categorized as thin or thick using a cut off of 2.5 mm. Data were presented using descriptive statistics and analysed. A p value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: About 113 out of 400 women (28.3%) had thin uterine scars. Inter-pregnancy interval (p<0.001), history of wound infection (p=0.01) and placenta location (p=0.001) were significant factors associated with uterine scar thickness. On adjusted logistic regression analysis, inter-pregnancy interval [aOR (95% CI) =2.35 (1.38-3.99), p=0.002], estimated fetal weight [aOR (95% CI) =0.54 (0.34-0.87), p=0.01] and anterior placenta location [aOR (95% CI) =0.55 (0.34-0.90), p=0.02] were factors most likely to predict uterine scar thickness. Conclusions: Uterine scar thickness assessment by sonography in pregnant women with previous cesarean sections can be easily integrated in an obstetric ultrasound. We recommend its routine application, and in combination with risk factors may guide decision on the mode of delivery and help prevent adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252715
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sonographic assessment of uterine scar thickness and associated factors among pregnant women with previous caesarean sections at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania

Alphaxard Kajura, Patrick Ngoya, Dismas Matovelo, Karoli Jerome et al.
1 links
International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Sonographic assessment of uterine scar thickness and associated factors among pregnant women with previous caesarean sections at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania

Alphaxard Kajura, Patrick Ngoya, Dismas Matovelo, Karoli Jerome, Feredina J. Nyakunga
article en

Abstract

Background: Uterine scar thickness has a practical application on the safe mode of delivery for pregnant woman with previous cesarean section (CS) lower uterine segment (LUS) scar. The study aimed to assess sonographic uterine scar thickness and associated factors among pregnant women with previous CS at a tertiary hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional analytical study was carried out at a tertiary hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania that included pregnant women with previous CS at term (≥ 36 weeks of gestation). Transabdominal obstetric ultrasound was performed. A uterine scar thickness was categorized as thin or thick using a cut off of 2.5 mm. Data were presented using descriptive statistics and analysed. A p value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: About 113 out of 400 women (28.3%) had thin uterine scars. Inter-pregnancy interval (p<0.001), history of wound infection (p=0.01) and placenta location (p=0.001) were significant factors associated with uterine scar thickness. On adjusted logistic regression analysis, inter-pregnancy interval [aOR (95% CI) =2.35 (1.38-3.99), p=0.002], estimated fetal weight [aOR (95% CI) =0.54 (0.34-0.87), p=0.01] and anterior placenta location [aOR (95% CI) =0.55 (0.34-0.90), p=0.02] were factors most likely to predict uterine scar thickness. Conclusions: Uterine scar thickness assessment by sonography in pregnant women with previous cesarean sections can be easily integrated in an obstetric ultrasound. We recommend its routine application, and in combination with risk factors may guide decision on the mode of delivery and help prevent adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.

International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 14(9)
Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ), Bugando Medical Centre (TZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.