Ordinal Simplicity in Discrete Mechanism Design

ABSTRACT In environments without transfers, market designers usually restrict attention to ordinal mechanisms. Ordinal mechanisms are simpler but miss potentially welfare‐relevant information. Under what conditions is it without loss to focus on ordinal mechanisms? We show that all group strategy‐proof mechanisms are ordinal. While not all Pareto efficient mechanisms are ordinal, all mechanisms maximizing an Arrovian social welfare function must be. These results accommodate feasibility constraints and allow for simple or complex demand. As applications, we characterize important classes of mechanisms in public choice and in the allocation of private goods under unit and multiunit demand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Economic Review
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.70010
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ordinal Simplicity in Discrete Mechanism Design

Marek Pycia, M. Utku Ünver
1 citations
International Economic Review
Game Theory and Voting Systems
3.13
article

Ordinal Simplicity in Discrete Mechanism Design

Marek Pycia, M. Utku Ünver
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In environments without transfers, market designers usually restrict attention to ordinal mechanisms. Ordinal mechanisms are simpler but miss potentially welfare‐relevant information. Under what conditions is it without loss to focus on ordinal mechanisms? We show that all group strategy‐proof mechanisms are ordinal. While not all Pareto efficient mechanisms are ordinal, all mechanisms maximizing an Arrovian social welfare function must be. These results accommodate feasibility constraints and allow for simple or complex demand. As applications, we characterize important classes of mechanisms in public choice and in the allocation of private goods under unit and multiunit demand.

International Economic ReviewVol. 66(4)
Boston College (US), University of Zurich (CH)
Princeton University, European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.