The Relation Between EU Law and the Constitutions of Member States in the Context of National Identity

The question on the relation between EU law and the constitutions of Member States is and has been a crucial question in the interplay or collaboration between national Constitutional Courts. The Court in Luxembourg maintains its doctrine on overall supremacy of EU law, but some constitutional courts disagree. The author will show, especially with regard to selected countries, like Croatia, how some constitutional courts elaborate their stand on the matter. For example, the Croatian Constitutional Court only briefly stated that the Constitution is above EU law, without any explanation. Other constitutional courts dealt with this issue more methodically and through various decisions through time. There are serious issues regarding the principle of supremacy and the relation of EU law and constitutional provisions of the constitutions of Member States, especially in those cases in which the respective constitutional court established its constitutional identity doctrine. Therefore, the author will try to show what is (or should be) the argumentation on this matter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Identity and Values
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55073/2025.1.179-193
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relation Between EU Law and the Constitutions of Member States in the Context of National Identity

Frane Staničić
Law Identity and Values
European Union Policy and Governance
article

The Relation Between EU Law and the Constitutions of Member States in the Context of National Identity

Frane Staničić
article en

Abstract

The question on the relation between EU law and the constitutions of Member States is and has been a crucial question in the interplay or collaboration between national Constitutional Courts. The Court in Luxembourg maintains its doctrine on overall supremacy of EU law, but some constitutional courts disagree. The author will show, especially with regard to selected countries, like Croatia, how some constitutional courts elaborate their stand on the matter. For example, the Croatian Constitutional Court only briefly stated that the Constitution is above EU law, without any explanation. Other constitutional courts dealt with this issue more methodically and through various decisions through time. There are serious issues regarding the principle of supremacy and the relation of EU law and constitutional provisions of the constitutions of Member States, especially in those cases in which the respective constitutional court established its constitutional identity doctrine. Therefore, the author will try to show what is (or should be) the argumentation on this matter.

Law Identity and ValuesVol. 5(1)
University of Zagreb (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Relation Between EU Law and the Constitutions of Member States in the Context of National Identity — Frane Staničić · Law Identity and Values (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS