Clinical audit of dynamic mobilisation exercise prescription and standards of health records in veterinary physiotherapy practice

Background: Dynamic mobilisation exercises (DME) are popular exercises prescribed during equine rehabilitation, however the application of these exercises in clinical practice has not been investigated. Evidence-based practice and accurate health recording are important for quality improvements in practice. Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was to improve DME prescription quality and ensure documentation meets Physiotherapy Board of New Zealand governing board standards. The objectives were to establish an evidence-based standard of prescription, to audit the prescription dosage, program duration, combination of exercises, the accuracy of the veterinary physiotherapists (VP) clinical notes and the ability of the client to achieve the correct exercise technique. Methods: Audit criteria were derived from a literature review. Retrospective data was collected from the health records of two VP, from the same practice and recorded on the data collection tool. Improvement was measured via a re-audit comparison. Results: Initial audit found that none of the 26 cases met criteria standards. Exercises were not prescribed with the correct dosage, program duration, or in conjunction with gym exercises. Health records indicated the exercise parameters but did not record if clients could achieve the correct technique. Implementation of changes (team discussion & changes made): Intervention included education for VP. Templates of health records and exercises were also implemented. Re-audit: No changes to the audit criteria or method were made. The correct technique was not achieved by 17/27 (62%) of the clients involved in the re-audit. This did not meet the criterion standard. All remaining audit standards were achieved. Application: The recommendations that were implemented resulted in more standardised DME prescription between the VP. Both VP became homogeneous with the dosage, program durations, exercise descriptions, and implemented accurate recording of their program parameters. Other practices should consider their own audits, educate practitioners, and implement customised templates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Evidence
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v10i3.725
Primary Topic
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical audit of dynamic mobilisation exercise prescription and standards of health records in veterinary physiotherapy practice

Kathryn Long, Catherine McGowan, Rebekah Davidson
Veterinary Evidence
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
article

Clinical audit of dynamic mobilisation exercise prescription and standards of health records in veterinary physiotherapy practice

Kathryn Long, Catherine McGowan, Rebekah Davidson
article en

Abstract

Background: Dynamic mobilisation exercises (DME) are popular exercises prescribed during equine rehabilitation, however the application of these exercises in clinical practice has not been investigated. Evidence-based practice and accurate health recording are important for quality improvements in practice. Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was to improve DME prescription quality and ensure documentation meets Physiotherapy Board of New Zealand governing board standards. The objectives were to establish an evidence-based standard of prescription, to audit the prescription dosage, program duration, combination of exercises, the accuracy of the veterinary physiotherapists (VP) clinical notes and the ability of the client to achieve the correct exercise technique. Methods: Audit criteria were derived from a literature review. Retrospective data was collected from the health records of two VP, from the same practice and recorded on the data collection tool. Improvement was measured via a re-audit comparison. Results: Initial audit found that none of the 26 cases met criteria standards. Exercises were not prescribed with the correct dosage, program duration, or in conjunction with gym exercises. Health records indicated the exercise parameters but did not record if clients could achieve the correct technique. Implementation of changes (team discussion & changes made): Intervention included education for VP. Templates of health records and exercises were also implemented. Re-audit: No changes to the audit criteria or method were made. The correct technique was not achieved by 17/27 (62%) of the clients involved in the re-audit. This did not meet the criterion standard. All remaining audit standards were achieved. Application: The recommendations that were implemented resulted in more standardised DME prescription between the VP. Both VP became homogeneous with the dosage, program durations, exercise descriptions, and implemented accurate recording of their program parameters. Other practices should consider their own audits, educate practitioners, and implement customised templates.

Veterinary EvidenceVol. 10(3)
University of Liverpool (GB), MEP Equine Solutions (United States) (US), Epic Care (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.