The individualized niche: A case study in scientific conceptual change

We explore the causes and outcomes of scientific conceptual change using a case study of the development of the individualized niche concept. We outline a framework for characterizing conceptual change that distinguishes between epistemically adaptive and neutral processes and outcomes of conceptual change. We then apply this framework in tracing how the individualized niche concept arose historically out of population niche thinking and how it exhibits plurality within a contemporary biological research program. While the individualized niche concept was developed adaptively to suit new research goals and empirical findings, some of its pluralistic aspects in contemporary research may have arisen neutrally, that is, for non-epistemic reasons. We suggest reasons for thinking that this plurality is unproblematic and may become useful, for instance, when it allows for the concept to be applied across differing research contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.003
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The individualized niche: A case study in scientific conceptual change

Katie H. Morrow, Marie I. Kaiser
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

The individualized niche: A case study in scientific conceptual change

Katie H. Morrow, Marie I. Kaiser
article en

Abstract

We explore the causes and outcomes of scientific conceptual change using a case study of the development of the individualized niche concept. We outline a framework for characterizing conceptual change that distinguishes between epistemically adaptive and neutral processes and outcomes of conceptual change. We then apply this framework in tracing how the individualized niche concept arose historically out of population niche thinking and how it exhibits plurality within a contemporary biological research program. While the individualized niche concept was developed adaptively to suit new research goals and empirical findings, some of its pluralistic aspects in contemporary research may have arisen neutrally, that is, for non-epistemic reasons. We suggest reasons for thinking that this plurality is unproblematic and may become useful, for instance, when it allows for the concept to be applied across differing research contexts.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part AVol. 113
Bielefeld University (DE), Hochschule Bielefeld (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The individualized niche: A case study in scientific conceptual change — Katie H. Morrow, Marie I. Kaiser · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS