Expert perceptions regarding the effectiveness and feasibility of nature‐based solutions for climate change adaptation in a large Mediterranean Basin

Abstract Floods and droughts are becoming increasingly frequent and intense in the Mediterranean region. Nature‐based solutions (NBS) are being put forward as cost‐effective solutions for climate change adaptation to reduce the impacts of floods and droughts and provide multiple other benefits and ecosystem services. This fundamental change in adaptation to extreme climate events is supported by scarce empirical evidence and fragmented knowledge on NBS effectiveness and feasibility to mitigate increasingly prolonged and extreme droughts and floods, leading to limited uptake. Expert‐based approaches can help assemble the fragmented empirical evidence and identify implementation barriers and opportunities to inform policy and decision‐makers at an early stage in the selection of NBS. In this study, we conducted expert consultation to gather experts' perceptions on the most effective and feasible NBS to mitigate the adverse effects of floods and droughts in the large Mediterranean Segura River basin in southeast Spain. Our results show that, according to experts, reforestation of headwaters and NBS affecting river and floodplain morphology should be prioritized over solutions in agricultural land and urban areas. Conversely, NBS affecting river and floodplain morphology were perceived as least feasible to implement due to required land expropriations resulting in high economic costs, social rejection and low political support. Experts considered NBS as promising solutions to mitigate floods and droughts and complementary to grey infrastructures; however, they were more convinced about the effectiveness for mitigation of floods than for droughts. To overcome barriers and support NBS implementation, responsible governance of the territory, provision of training to policy makers and economic investment stood out as priority actions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70117
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert perceptions regarding the effectiveness and feasibility of nature‐based solutions for climate change adaptation in a large Mediterranean Basin

Carolina Boix‐Fayos, Joris de Vente, Raquel Luján Soto
2 citations
People and Nature
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
article

Expert perceptions regarding the effectiveness and feasibility of nature‐based solutions for climate change adaptation in a large Mediterranean Basin

Carolina Boix‐Fayos, Joris de Vente, Raquel Luján Soto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Floods and droughts are becoming increasingly frequent and intense in the Mediterranean region. Nature‐based solutions (NBS) are being put forward as cost‐effective solutions for climate change adaptation to reduce the impacts of floods and droughts and provide multiple other benefits and ecosystem services. This fundamental change in adaptation to extreme climate events is supported by scarce empirical evidence and fragmented knowledge on NBS effectiveness and feasibility to mitigate increasingly prolonged and extreme droughts and floods, leading to limited uptake. Expert‐based approaches can help assemble the fragmented empirical evidence and identify implementation barriers and opportunities to inform policy and decision‐makers at an early stage in the selection of NBS. In this study, we conducted expert consultation to gather experts' perceptions on the most effective and feasible NBS to mitigate the adverse effects of floods and droughts in the large Mediterranean Segura River basin in southeast Spain. Our results show that, according to experts, reforestation of headwaters and NBS affecting river and floodplain morphology should be prioritized over solutions in agricultural land and urban areas. Conversely, NBS affecting river and floodplain morphology were perceived as least feasible to implement due to required land expropriations resulting in high economic costs, social rejection and low political support. Experts considered NBS as promising solutions to mitigate floods and droughts and complementary to grey infrastructures; however, they were more convinced about the effectiveness for mitigation of floods than for droughts. To overcome barriers and support NBS implementation, responsible governance of the territory, provision of training to policy makers and economic investment stood out as priority actions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and NatureVol. 7(10)
Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (ES), Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento (ES), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Fundación Séneca, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, European Commission, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.