Stress and burnout among social workers – a relation mediated by coping styles

As social workers experience higher levels of stress and burnout than comparable occupational groups, understanding what mediates their relationship could help develop adequate support services. Little is known about the mediating role of social workers’ coping strategies in the relationship between perceived stress and burnout, even more so in Romania, where the profession was reinstated after the fall of communism. We used measures of stress (Perceived Stress Questionnaire), coping (Brief-COPE), and burnout (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-CBI). Following previous research, in a convenience sample of registered social workers (n = 324), we first test if stress and burnout are statistically significant correlated and second if problem-focused, emotion-focused, and avoidant coping mediate the relationship between stress and personal and work-related burnout experienced by Romanian social workers. Results show that avoidant coping (standardized indirect effect 0.044) partially mediates the relation between stress and personal burnout and emotion-focused coping (standardized indirect effect 0.022) partially mediates the relation between stress and work-related burnout, both having a reduced mediation impact. However, problem-focused coping does not mediate the relationship between stress and burnout. There is a low positive and significant partial mediation of (a) self-blame coping strategy (standardized indirect effect 0.046) in the relation between perceived stress and personal burnout and (b) denial coping strategy (standardized indirect effect 0.022) in the relation between perceived stress and work-related burnout. When comparing perceived stress and burnout levels, a more frequent use of maladaptive coping strategies leads to higher levels of stress and burnout, while a more frequent use of adaptive strategies has no effect. Our data show the need for training and developing adequate mechanisms to help social workers regulate stress levels. Future studies should investigate the role external factors (e.g., organizational or structural) play in reducing burnout levels and assuring that social workers’ needs for a healthy working climate are met.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05780-1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress and burnout among social workers – a relation mediated by coping styles

Lucian Aleçu, Ovidiu Pop, Adrian Luca, Daniela Gaba et al.
4 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
11.26
article

Stress and burnout among social workers – a relation mediated by coping styles

Lucian Aleçu, Ovidiu Pop, Adrian Luca, Daniela Gaba, Florin Lazăr, Anca Mihai, Georgiana Cristina Rentea, Elen Silvana Crivoi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

As social workers experience higher levels of stress and burnout than comparable occupational groups, understanding what mediates their relationship could help develop adequate support services. Little is known about the mediating role of social workers’ coping strategies in the relationship between perceived stress and burnout, even more so in Romania, where the profession was reinstated after the fall of communism. We used measures of stress (Perceived Stress Questionnaire), coping (Brief-COPE), and burnout (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-CBI). Following previous research, in a convenience sample of registered social workers (n = 324), we first test if stress and burnout are statistically significant correlated and second if problem-focused, emotion-focused, and avoidant coping mediate the relationship between stress and personal and work-related burnout experienced by Romanian social workers. Results show that avoidant coping (standardized indirect effect 0.044) partially mediates the relation between stress and personal burnout and emotion-focused coping (standardized indirect effect 0.022) partially mediates the relation between stress and work-related burnout, both having a reduced mediation impact. However, problem-focused coping does not mediate the relationship between stress and burnout. There is a low positive and significant partial mediation of (a) self-blame coping strategy (standardized indirect effect 0.046) in the relation between perceived stress and personal burnout and (b) denial coping strategy (standardized indirect effect 0.022) in the relation between perceived stress and work-related burnout. When comparing perceived stress and burnout levels, a more frequent use of maladaptive coping strategies leads to higher levels of stress and burnout, while a more frequent use of adaptive strategies has no effect. Our data show the need for training and developing adequate mechanisms to help social workers regulate stress levels. Future studies should investigate the role external factors (e.g., organizational or structural) play in reducing burnout levels and assuring that social workers’ needs for a healthy working climate are met.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
National School of Political Science and Public Administration (RO), University of Bucharest (RO), National Bank of Romania (RO)
Ministerul Cercetării, Inovării şi Digitalizării, Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
11.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.