Geographies of super-philanthropy: Complex factions

In this paper, we revisit our conceptualization of the philanthropic complex via three avenues: first, the risk of foreclosing political possibilities in our analysis of the complex; second, the methodological possibilities of relational thinking; and third, the stakes of recuperating the progressive possibilities of philanthropy. We acknowledge and reiterate the evolving relationship between multiple, contradictory factions of philanthropy, capital, and policy agendas. While our original article emphasized the depoliticizing tendencies of the philanthropic complex in relation to neoliberalism, here we address the question of re-politicization. We also discuss the idea of decolonizing and de-centering narratives about the complex. At a time when the philanthropic complex might have reached a turning point, it is more necessary than ever to consider global viewpoints on philanthropy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues in Human Geography
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206251364970
Primary Topic
Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geographies of super-philanthropy: Complex factions

Pablo Fuentenebro, Emily Rosenman, Rachel Bok, Michele Acuto
Dialogues in Human Geography
Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
article

Geographies of super-philanthropy: Complex factions

Pablo Fuentenebro, Emily Rosenman, Rachel Bok, Michele Acuto
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit our conceptualization of the philanthropic complex via three avenues: first, the risk of foreclosing political possibilities in our analysis of the complex; second, the methodological possibilities of relational thinking; and third, the stakes of recuperating the progressive possibilities of philanthropy. We acknowledge and reiterate the evolving relationship between multiple, contradictory factions of philanthropy, capital, and policy agendas. While our original article emphasized the depoliticizing tendencies of the philanthropic complex in relation to neoliberalism, here we address the question of re-politicization. We also discuss the idea of decolonizing and de-centering narratives about the complex. At a time when the philanthropic complex might have reached a turning point, it is more necessary than ever to consider global viewpoints on philanthropy.

Dialogues in Human GeographyVol. 15(3)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Helsinki (FI), University of Toronto (CA), University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.