Impact of Draught Power Utilization on the Nutritional and Sensory Quality of Borgou Cattle Meat in Benin

Draught power can influence cattle meat quality. The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of draught power on nutritional and sensorial qualities of Borgou cattle used for agricultural works in Northern Benin. For this purpose, 21 clinically healthy Borgou oxen, of 5 years old, grazing under the same agroecological conditions were used, including 10 animals employed in draft work for two years and 11 animals not subjected to draft work. Nutritional parameters and sensorial attributes of the Longissimus thoracis muscle were measured. Student’s t-test was used to compare means. The results on the proximate composition of Borgou cattle meat shows that draft work had no statistically significant effect (p>0.05) on dry matter, ash, fat, or crude protein contents. Dry matter content was almost similar between draft animals (22.85 g/100 g) and the control group (22.77 g/100 g). Similarly, ash content remained comparable and varied between 0.89 g/100 g and 0.91 g/100g in both groups. Although non-significant, a slight tendency was observed for higher crude protein levels in meat from draft animals (20.32 g/100 g) compared to controls (20.09 g/100 g), whereas fat content appeared higher in control animals (1.79 g/100 g) than in draft animals (1.56 g/100 g). The sensory evaluation indicates that meat from draught animals had recorded the higher scores for flavor (4.59 ± 0.03 vs. 4.15 ± 0.07; p < 0.001), texture (4.71 ± 0.02 vs. 4.20 ± 0.07; p < 0.001), juiciness (4.59 ± 0.03 vs. 3.95 ± 0.09; p < 0.001), and taste (4.71 ± 0.02 vs. 4.30 ± 0.06; p < 0.001). Similarly, the overall acceptability was significantly higher in meat from draught animals (4.69 ± 0.02) compared to the control group (4.17 ± 0.03; p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was observed for color (4.57 ± 0.03 vs. 4.43 ± 0.06; NS. Overall, these results suggest that exposure to draft work did not markedly alter the proximate composition of Borgou beef but improve its sensory attributes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Biochemistry Research & Review
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ijbcrr/2025/v34i51033
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Draught Power Utilization on the Nutritional and Sensory Quality of Borgou Cattle Meat in Benin

Ibrahim Imorou Toko, Franck Hongbété, Ulbad Polycarpe Tougan, GOUNOU N’GOBI Bakassidi et al.
International Journal of Biochemistry Research & Review
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
article

Impact of Draught Power Utilization on the Nutritional and Sensory Quality of Borgou Cattle Meat in Benin

Ibrahim Imorou Toko, Franck Hongbété, Ulbad Polycarpe Tougan, GOUNOU N’GOBI Bakassidi, AMOUSSA Michkath Akambi
article en

Abstract

Draught power can influence cattle meat quality. The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of draught power on nutritional and sensorial qualities of Borgou cattle used for agricultural works in Northern Benin. For this purpose, 21 clinically healthy Borgou oxen, of 5 years old, grazing under the same agroecological conditions were used, including 10 animals employed in draft work for two years and 11 animals not subjected to draft work. Nutritional parameters and sensorial attributes of the Longissimus thoracis muscle were measured. Student’s t-test was used to compare means. The results on the proximate composition of Borgou cattle meat shows that draft work had no statistically significant effect (p>0.05) on dry matter, ash, fat, or crude protein contents. Dry matter content was almost similar between draft animals (22.85 g/100 g) and the control group (22.77 g/100 g). Similarly, ash content remained comparable and varied between 0.89 g/100 g and 0.91 g/100g in both groups. Although non-significant, a slight tendency was observed for higher crude protein levels in meat from draft animals (20.32 g/100 g) compared to controls (20.09 g/100 g), whereas fat content appeared higher in control animals (1.79 g/100 g) than in draft animals (1.56 g/100 g). The sensory evaluation indicates that meat from draught animals had recorded the higher scores for flavor (4.59 ± 0.03 vs. 4.15 ± 0.07; p < 0.001), texture (4.71 ± 0.02 vs. 4.20 ± 0.07; p < 0.001), juiciness (4.59 ± 0.03 vs. 3.95 ± 0.09; p < 0.001), and taste (4.71 ± 0.02 vs. 4.30 ± 0.06; p < 0.001). Similarly, the overall acceptability was significantly higher in meat from draught animals (4.69 ± 0.02) compared to the control group (4.17 ± 0.03; p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was observed for color (4.57 ± 0.03 vs. 4.43 ± 0.06; NS. Overall, these results suggest that exposure to draft work did not markedly alter the proximate composition of Borgou beef but improve its sensory attributes.

International Journal of Biochemistry Research & ReviewVol. 34(5)
Université de Parakou (BJ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.