AML-328: Genomic Landscape of Copy-Neutral LOH and CNA in Intermediate-Risk AML: Recurrent Alterations in PHF6, SMC1A, and KMT2A Genes

The copy number alteration (CNA) and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) significantly contribute to the mutational profile of AML. In this study, we examined CNA and cnLOH in genes whose mutations are known to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AML. To identify CNA and cnLOH in NPM1, CBL, FLT3, JAK2, KIT, KRAS, MPL, NRAS, CALR, CSF3R, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, TET2, ASXL1, BCOR, BCORL1, EZH2, KMT2A, SETBP1, NF1, PHF6, TP53, WT1, CEBPA, ETV6, GATA2, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, ZRSR2, RAD21, SMC1A, SMC3, and STAG2 genes in tumor genomes of intermediate-risk AML patients using chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). We included 34 patients with AML who were treated in our center between 2017 and 2022. All patients belonged to an intermediate-risk group according to European LeukemiaNet (ELN-2022). Most of the patients (29/34) had a normal karyotype. Two patients had karyotype not belonging to a good or adverse group and in four cases karyotype could not be determined due to the absence of mitosis, although FISH ruled out adverse aberrations. FLT3 -ITD mutations were found in 13/34 (38%) of patients. CMA was performed on tumor DNA obtained during the primary diagnosis, either from fresh samples or from archival material. CMAwas carried out with ThermoFisher Scientific equipment using the CytoScan™ HT-CMA 96F array SNPoligonucleotide microarray in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. Data were analyzed using Chromosome Analysis Suite and processed with Python 3.12.4 and SAS 9.4.We compared our CMA data with a triple-matched control dataset from 102 ostensibly healthy individuals (HI). The most frequent events were cnLOH of PHF6 (55.88% in patients vs 44.12% in HI) , SMC1A (53.94% in patients vs 53.92% in HI) , BCORL1 (50% in patients vs 36.27% in HI) and BCOR (35.29% in patients vs 32.35% in HI). In contrast, gain of KMT2A (14.71%) and cnLOH KMT2A (8.82%) were revealed only in patients. The high frequency of cnLOH (virtually, the homozygotizing of mutations) in the PHF6 , SMC1A , and BCOR genes may suggest their role as “second hits” in leukemia development. On the other hand, KMT2A alterations represent specific drivers of the disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2152-2650(25)01654-4
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AML-328: Genomic Landscape of Copy-Neutral LOH and CNA in Intermediate-Risk AML: Recurrent Alterations in PHF6, SMC1A, and KMT2A Genes

З. Т. Фидарова, Yulia Chabaeva, Hunan Julhakyan, Natalya Risinskaya et al.
Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

AML-328: Genomic Landscape of Copy-Neutral LOH and CNA in Intermediate-Risk AML: Recurrent Alterations in PHF6, SMC1A, and KMT2A Genes

З. Т. Фидарова, Yulia Chabaeva, Hunan Julhakyan, Natalya Risinskaya, С. М. Куликов, Andrey Sudarikov, Irina Lukianova, Ilya Kanivets, Sofia Starchenko, Dmitry Bessmertnyy, Valeriya Surimova, A. A. Ponomareva, Anastasia Kashlakova, Elena Parovichikova
article en

Abstract

The copy number alteration (CNA) and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) significantly contribute to the mutational profile of AML. In this study, we examined CNA and cnLOH in genes whose mutations are known to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AML. To identify CNA and cnLOH in NPM1, CBL, FLT3, JAK2, KIT, KRAS, MPL, NRAS, CALR, CSF3R, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, TET2, ASXL1, BCOR, BCORL1, EZH2, KMT2A, SETBP1, NF1, PHF6, TP53, WT1, CEBPA, ETV6, GATA2, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, ZRSR2, RAD21, SMC1A, SMC3, and STAG2 genes in tumor genomes of intermediate-risk AML patients using chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). We included 34 patients with AML who were treated in our center between 2017 and 2022. All patients belonged to an intermediate-risk group according to European LeukemiaNet (ELN-2022). Most of the patients (29/34) had a normal karyotype. Two patients had karyotype not belonging to a good or adverse group and in four cases karyotype could not be determined due to the absence of mitosis, although FISH ruled out adverse aberrations. FLT3 -ITD mutations were found in 13/34 (38%) of patients. CMA was performed on tumor DNA obtained during the primary diagnosis, either from fresh samples or from archival material. CMAwas carried out with ThermoFisher Scientific equipment using the CytoScan™ HT-CMA 96F array SNPoligonucleotide microarray in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. Data were analyzed using Chromosome Analysis Suite and processed with Python 3.12.4 and SAS 9.4.We compared our CMA data with a triple-matched control dataset from 102 ostensibly healthy individuals (HI). The most frequent events were cnLOH of PHF6 (55.88% in patients vs 44.12% in HI) , SMC1A (53.94% in patients vs 53.92% in HI) , BCORL1 (50% in patients vs 36.27% in HI) and BCOR (35.29% in patients vs 32.35% in HI). In contrast, gain of KMT2A (14.71%) and cnLOH KMT2A (8.82%) were revealed only in patients. The high frequency of cnLOH (virtually, the homozygotizing of mutations) in the PHF6 , SMC1A , and BCOR genes may suggest their role as “second hits” in leukemia development. On the other hand, KMT2A alterations represent specific drivers of the disease.

Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & LeukemiaVol. 25
National Medical Research Center for Hematology (RU), Center for Genomic Science (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.