On the Political Economy of Conflicts in the Middle East and Africa

ABSTRACT In this research, we aim to identify the main factors that explain the occurrence and intensity of armed conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa. We extend the conventional linear Bayesian Model Averaging procedure by incorporating conflict intensity, which is measured across a spectrum of violence levels, departing from the typical binary classification of war or peace. We provide strong evidence that not only demographical, institutional, and socio‐economic but also environmental factors must be considered when analysing conflict onset and intensity. Notably, institutional variables become more significant when accounting for neighbouring effects. Furthermore, institutional, economic, and historical factors are essential for understanding the role of environmental factors in shaping conflict dynamics. Finally, we show that model averaging predictions for ordered categorical outcomes improve upon the existing out‐of‐sample conflict prediction techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics of Transition and Institutional Change
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.70002
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Political Economy of Conflicts in the Middle East and Africa

Olivier Parent, Abdallah Zouache
Economics of Transition and Institutional Change
Political Conflict and Governance
article

On the Political Economy of Conflicts in the Middle East and Africa

Olivier Parent, Abdallah Zouache
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this research, we aim to identify the main factors that explain the occurrence and intensity of armed conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa. We extend the conventional linear Bayesian Model Averaging procedure by incorporating conflict intensity, which is measured across a spectrum of violence levels, departing from the typical binary classification of war or peace. We provide strong evidence that not only demographical, institutional, and socio‐economic but also environmental factors must be considered when analysing conflict onset and intensity. Notably, institutional variables become more significant when accounting for neighbouring effects. Furthermore, institutional, economic, and historical factors are essential for understanding the role of environmental factors in shaping conflict dynamics. Finally, we show that model averaging predictions for ordered categorical outcomes improve upon the existing out‐of‐sample conflict prediction techniques.

Economics of Transition and Institutional ChangeVol. 34(1)
Université de Lille (FR), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Lyme Disease Association, Charles Phelps Taft Research Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.