The development and validation of a self-reinforcement scale for repeated blood donation

The current study aimed to develop and validate a self-reinforcement scale for repeated blood donation (SRS-RBD). In Study 1, six items were created, and the factor structure of SRS-RBD was explored among 155 Chinese student blood donors. In Study 2, SRS-RBD was validated among 164 donors. In Study 3, a total of 850 blood donors were invited to participate in an online-survey measuring SRS-RBD at baseline, and their RBD behavior was captured 6 months later. A two-factor structure of SRS-RBD was established in Study 1 and further validated in Study 2 and Study 3. The SRS-RBD demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity. A cut-off score of 20 was suggested as having the best performance to identify donors who had a high chance to re-donate. The SRS-RBD can be considered reliable in measuring the self-reinforcement of RBD among blood donors. The scale may be a useful tool in blood donation practice and research programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03186-x
Primary Topic
Blood donation and transfusion practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The development and validation of a self-reinforcement scale for repeated blood donation

Huahua Hu, Qiuyue Hu, Wei Hu, Joseph T. F. Lau et al.
BMC Psychology
Blood donation and transfusion practices
article

The development and validation of a self-reinforcement scale for repeated blood donation

Huahua Hu, Qiuyue Hu, Wei Hu, Joseph T. F. Lau, Hujiao Kuang, Yangang Nie, Phoenix K. H. Mo
article en

Abstract

The current study aimed to develop and validate a self-reinforcement scale for repeated blood donation (SRS-RBD). In Study 1, six items were created, and the factor structure of SRS-RBD was explored among 155 Chinese student blood donors. In Study 2, SRS-RBD was validated among 164 donors. In Study 3, a total of 850 blood donors were invited to participate in an online-survey measuring SRS-RBD at baseline, and their RBD behavior was captured 6 months later. A two-factor structure of SRS-RBD was established in Study 1 and further validated in Study 2 and Study 3. The SRS-RBD demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity. A cut-off score of 20 was suggested as having the best performance to identify donors who had a high chance to re-donate. The SRS-RBD can be considered reliable in measuring the self-reinforcement of RBD among blood donors. The scale may be a useful tool in blood donation practice and research programs.

BMC PsychologyVol. 13(1)
Department of Health (CN), Guangdong Medical College (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Guangzhou University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN), Blood Center of Zhejiang Province (CN), Jinzhou Kangning Hospital (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Blood donation and transfusion practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The development and validation of a self-reinforcement scale for repeated blood donation — Huahua Hu, Qiuyue Hu, et al. · BMC Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS