Factors Influencing Mpox Vaccines Acceptance Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The sporadic mpox disease outbreak in Africa poses a global public health challenge. Although vaccines have been developed to combat the disease, its acceptance among healthcare workers (HCWs) varies across nations. This study aims to estimate the pooled mpox vaccine acceptance among HCWs and its associated factors. Databases and JBI appraisal checklist were used to include 21 studies. Heterogeneity and publication bias were checked with the I 2 test and funnel plot, respectively. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to estimate mpox vaccine acceptance among HCWs. The Eggers and Beggs test was computed to see if there is small study effect. This review included 21 studies with 13,969 participants. The overall pooled prevalence of HCWs’ mpox vaccines acceptance was 53.43% (95% CI [41.67, 65.19]). The HCWs with vaccine eagerness (OR: 4.78 [2.35, 7.21]), previous COVID-19 infections (OR: 1.47 [1.24, 1.69]), public health risk concern about mpox disease (OR: 3.57 [1.68, 5.46]), and good knowledge scores (OR: 2.04 [1.67, 2.41]) had higher odds of willing to receive mpox vaccines. However, HCWs who did not apply tighter infection prevention and control measures had reduced odds of mpox vaccine acceptance (OR: 0.59 [0.30, 0.87]). The acceptance of mpox vaccine among HCWs was still low worldwide. Therefore, national health ministries and global actors should prioritize the factors identified in this study, including providing training and enforcing crucial vaccine intervention strategies among high-risk groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251368747
Primary Topic
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing Mpox Vaccines Acceptance Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chalachew Yenew, Amare Mebrat Delie, Zewdu Bishaw Aynalem, Gashaw Melkie Bayeh et al.
SAGE Open
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
article

Factors Influencing Mpox Vaccines Acceptance Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chalachew Yenew, Amare Mebrat Delie, Zewdu Bishaw Aynalem, Gashaw Melkie Bayeh, Denekew Tenaw Anley, Tilahun Degu Tsega, Abathun Temesgen, Amare Genetu Ejigu, Molla Getie, Almaw Genet Yeshiwas
article en

Abstract

The sporadic mpox disease outbreak in Africa poses a global public health challenge. Although vaccines have been developed to combat the disease, its acceptance among healthcare workers (HCWs) varies across nations. This study aims to estimate the pooled mpox vaccine acceptance among HCWs and its associated factors. Databases and JBI appraisal checklist were used to include 21 studies. Heterogeneity and publication bias were checked with the I 2 test and funnel plot, respectively. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to estimate mpox vaccine acceptance among HCWs. The Eggers and Beggs test was computed to see if there is small study effect. This review included 21 studies with 13,969 participants. The overall pooled prevalence of HCWs’ mpox vaccines acceptance was 53.43% (95% CI [41.67, 65.19]). The HCWs with vaccine eagerness (OR: 4.78 [2.35, 7.21]), previous COVID-19 infections (OR: 1.47 [1.24, 1.69]), public health risk concern about mpox disease (OR: 3.57 [1.68, 5.46]), and good knowledge scores (OR: 2.04 [1.67, 2.41]) had higher odds of willing to receive mpox vaccines. However, HCWs who did not apply tighter infection prevention and control measures had reduced odds of mpox vaccine acceptance (OR: 0.59 [0.30, 0.87]). The acceptance of mpox vaccine among HCWs was still low worldwide. Therefore, national health ministries and global actors should prioritize the factors identified in this study, including providing training and enforcing crucial vaccine intervention strategies among high-risk groups.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(3)
Debre Tabor University (ET), Jigjiga University (ET), Injibara University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.