Restriction of Religiously Insensitive Expressions in the Context of the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed – When Experience Is Not Enough

The ECtHR, when assessing religiously offensive, inappropriate or blasphemous speech under Article 10 of the ECHR, uses the protection of religious peace as a legitimate reason for restricting freedom of expression. It associates this concept with the protection of the religious feelings of believers. The approach chosen by the ECtHR to the concept of the protection of religious peace is not appropriate. This article identifies conditions under which religiously offensive, inappropriate or blasphemous ways of exercising freedom of expression can constitute a disruption of peaceful coexistence. It discusses reactions to the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, which gradually led to the violent expression of disagreement among Muslims with their publication. The case draws attention to the question of whether it should be possible to restrict freedom of speech based on mere experience of violent reactions to religiously insensitive speech.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2025.502
Primary Topic
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restriction of Religiously Insensitive Expressions in the Context of the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed – When Experience Is Not Enough

Lucie Jurečková
AUC IURIDICA
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
article

Restriction of Religiously Insensitive Expressions in the Context of the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed – When Experience Is Not Enough

Lucie Jurečková
article en

Abstract

The ECtHR, when assessing religiously offensive, inappropriate or blasphemous speech under Article 10 of the ECHR, uses the protection of religious peace as a legitimate reason for restricting freedom of expression. It associates this concept with the protection of the religious feelings of believers. The approach chosen by the ECtHR to the concept of the protection of religious peace is not appropriate. This article identifies conditions under which religiously offensive, inappropriate or blasphemous ways of exercising freedom of expression can constitute a disruption of peaceful coexistence. It discusses reactions to the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, which gradually led to the violent expression of disagreement among Muslims with their publication. The case draws attention to the question of whether it should be possible to restrict freedom of speech based on mere experience of violent reactions to religiously insensitive speech.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 71(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Restriction of Religiously Insensitive Expressions in the Context of the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed – When Experience Is Not Enough — Lucie Jurečková · AUC IURIDICA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS