Oral PrEP use and intention to use long-acting PrEP regimens among MSM accessing PrEP via governmental and non-governmental provision pathways, 20 European countries, October 2023 to April 2024

BACKGROUNDPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provision routes across Europe differ notably between governmental and non-governmental pathways. The introduction of long-acting (LA)-PrEP may further diversify provision dynamics.AIMWe investigated disparities in PrEP access and whether access pathways determine oral PrEP use patterns and LA-PrEP intention among PrEP-experienced men who have sex with men (MSM).METHODSUsing data from 7,505 PrEP-experienced MSM from a cross-sectional survey (PROTECT; 20 European countries, October 2023-April 2024), we used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify MSM's latent socioeconomic positions (SEPs), and logistic regression to compare the likelihood of accessing governmental/non-governmental pathways, and compare oral PrEP adherence, discontinuation and LA-PrEP intention between governmental/non-governmental pathways.RESULTSMost MSM accessed PrEP via governmental pathways (n = 6,671; 88.9%), 11.1% (n = 834) used non-governmental pathways. The LCA identified three groups: employed MSM with more advantaged SEPs, younger MSM with less advantaged SEPs, and older MSM with more advantaged SEPs. Compared with the first group, younger MSM with less advantaged SEPs were significantly more likely to access PrEP via non-governmental pathways (aOR = 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.55). Accessing PrEP via non-governmental pathways was associated with suboptimal adherence (aOR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.03-1.58), discontinuation (aOR = 3.55; 95% CI: 2.99-4.21), but also higher LA-PrEP intention (aOR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.06-1.56).CONCLUSIONSInequalities exist in PrEP access among MSM in Europe. While non-governmental pathways offer opportunities to engage MSM with less advantaged SEPs, oral PrEP use patterns via this pathway were not optimal. Tailored efforts should ensure that PrEP is accessible and affordable to enhance current use and prepare for future LA-PrEP modalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eurosurveillance
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.es.2025.30.34.2500122
Citations
4
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral PrEP use and intention to use long-acting PrEP regimens among MSM accessing PrEP via governmental and non-governmental provision pathways, 20 European countries, October 2023 to April 2024

Melanie Schroeder, Jonathan Tosh, A. Lozano, Kai J. Jonas et al.
4 citations
Eurosurveillance
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
5.58
article

Oral PrEP use and intention to use long-acting PrEP regimens among MSM accessing PrEP via governmental and non-governmental provision pathways, 20 European countries, October 2023 to April 2024

Melanie Schroeder, Jonathan Tosh, A. Lozano, Kai J. Jonas, Ama Appiah, Hanne M. L. Zimmermann, Johann Kolstee, Haoyi Wang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUNDPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provision routes across Europe differ notably between governmental and non-governmental pathways. The introduction of long-acting (LA)-PrEP may further diversify provision dynamics.AIMWe investigated disparities in PrEP access and whether access pathways determine oral PrEP use patterns and LA-PrEP intention among PrEP-experienced men who have sex with men (MSM).METHODSUsing data from 7,505 PrEP-experienced MSM from a cross-sectional survey (PROTECT; 20 European countries, October 2023-April 2024), we used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify MSM's latent socioeconomic positions (SEPs), and logistic regression to compare the likelihood of accessing governmental/non-governmental pathways, and compare oral PrEP adherence, discontinuation and LA-PrEP intention between governmental/non-governmental pathways.RESULTSMost MSM accessed PrEP via governmental pathways (n = 6,671; 88.9%), 11.1% (n = 834) used non-governmental pathways. The LCA identified three groups: employed MSM with more advantaged SEPs, younger MSM with less advantaged SEPs, and older MSM with more advantaged SEPs. Compared with the first group, younger MSM with less advantaged SEPs were significantly more likely to access PrEP via non-governmental pathways (aOR = 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.55). Accessing PrEP via non-governmental pathways was associated with suboptimal adherence (aOR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.03-1.58), discontinuation (aOR = 3.55; 95% CI: 2.99-4.21), but also higher LA-PrEP intention (aOR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.06-1.56).CONCLUSIONSInequalities exist in PrEP access among MSM in Europe. While non-governmental pathways offer opportunities to engage MSM with less advantaged SEPs, oral PrEP use patterns via this pathway were not optimal. Tailored efforts should ensure that PrEP is accessible and affordable to enhance current use and prepare for future LA-PrEP modalities.

EurosurveillanceVol. 30(34)
Maastricht University (NL), ViiV Healthcare (United Kingdom) (GB), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
ViiV Healthcare
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
5.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.