Acceptability Among Healthcare Providers of In Situ, Low-Dose, High-Frequency Neonatal Resuscitation Simulation Training Using Innovative Tools: Evidence from the Safer Births Bundle of Care

<b>Introduction</b>: Newborn mortality is unacceptably high, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The Safer Births Bundle of Care (SBBC) was implemented in Tanzania, including training of healthcare workers on neonatal resuscitation by means of frequent in situ simulation training using improved training tools. We aimed to assess the acceptability of this training model among healthcare providers in selected health facilities under SBBC intervention. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare workers in labor wards and obstetric theaters in selected facilities one year after the introduction of the SBBC model. The theoretical framework for assessment of the acceptability of healthcare interventions was used to assess the acceptability of the training model and accompanying tools. The chi-square test was used to assess the association between acceptability in specific constructs and average individual practice per month, while a modified Poisson regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with acceptability in specific framework constructs. <b>Results</b>: A total of 227 healthcare workers were enrolled in the study. Overall, 223 (98.2%) accepted the intervention. However, 207 (91.2%) reported that the intervention increased their work burden, while 39 (17.2%) reported that it interfered with other equally important activities. The level of health facility was independently associated with the reporting that engaging in simulation practice interfered with other equally important activities. <b>Conclusions</b>: In situ, low-dose, high-frequency facility-based simulation training for neonatal resuscitation was highly acceptable among healthcare providers. However, the perceived increased work burden of this intervention and interference with other equally important activities were identified as potential threats to successful implementation.