Do students need to think hard? The interplay of AI and cognitive abilities in solving problems

Abstract A key psychological factor shaping students’ approach to problem-solving is their need for cognition—their drive to engage in and enjoy mentally demanding tasks. Students with a lower need for cognition may favour more structured or straightforward methods for solving problems. This study investigates the role of using Artificial Intelligence in solving economic problems by non-AI expert students, examining the effects of Cognitive reflection, the Need for cognition, and creativity on problem-solving performance. Results show that students with high Cognitive reflection and Need for cognition scores performed better, relying less on using Artificial Intelligence tools, particularly when satisfied with completing complex tasks. Students trusted Artificial Intelligence more when their reflective thinking and task satisfaction were lower, aligning with findings on trust transfer between users and Artificial Intelligence systems. Creativity has no influence on AI effectiveness, with students’ success depending on how well they structure Artificial Intelligence prompts. While Cognitive reflection and the satisfaction of completing complex tasks contribute to positive outcomes in solving economic problems, the introduction of Artificial Intelligence led to a decrease in student performance. As generative Artificial Intelligence tools become more common in educational contexts, it is crucial to understand how these cognitive preferences influence the effectiveness of AI-driven problem-solving environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13738-8
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do students need to think hard? The interplay of AI and cognitive abilities in solving problems

Silvia Sumedrea, Cătălin Maican, Ana‐Maria Cazan, Adrian Alexandru Moșoi
6 citations
Education and Information Technologies
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
14.89
article

Do students need to think hard? The interplay of AI and cognitive abilities in solving problems

Silvia Sumedrea, Cătălin Maican, Ana‐Maria Cazan, Adrian Alexandru Moșoi
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract A key psychological factor shaping students’ approach to problem-solving is their need for cognition—their drive to engage in and enjoy mentally demanding tasks. Students with a lower need for cognition may favour more structured or straightforward methods for solving problems. This study investigates the role of using Artificial Intelligence in solving economic problems by non-AI expert students, examining the effects of Cognitive reflection, the Need for cognition, and creativity on problem-solving performance. Results show that students with high Cognitive reflection and Need for cognition scores performed better, relying less on using Artificial Intelligence tools, particularly when satisfied with completing complex tasks. Students trusted Artificial Intelligence more when their reflective thinking and task satisfaction were lower, aligning with findings on trust transfer between users and Artificial Intelligence systems. Creativity has no influence on AI effectiveness, with students’ success depending on how well they structure Artificial Intelligence prompts. While Cognitive reflection and the satisfaction of completing complex tasks contribute to positive outcomes in solving economic problems, the introduction of Artificial Intelligence led to a decrease in student performance. As generative Artificial Intelligence tools become more common in educational contexts, it is crucial to understand how these cognitive preferences influence the effectiveness of AI-driven problem-solving environments.

Education and Information TechnologiesVol. 30(17)
Transylvania University of Brașov (RO), Romanian Academy (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
14.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do students need to think hard? The interplay of AI and cognitive abilities in solving problems — Silvia Sumedrea, Cătălin Maican, et al. · Education and Information Technologies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS