The Discouraging Effect of Overconfidence

ABSTRACT Overconfidence is often viewed as encouraging entrepreneurs and CEOs to follow risky strategies such as entering new markets, engaging in innovation, or pursuing mergers and acquisitions. While such undertakings can generate excess returns and profits, overconfidence is frequently offered as an explanation for why so many business ventures fail. However, we show that in a setting where the decision maker does not know whether success is possible, theoretically, overconfidence can also have a discouraging effect, causing one to give up too soon. This counterintuitive result is driven by effectively misattributing one's own failure to an elevated assessment of the chance that success is not possible. In a controlled laboratory experiment, we find general support for the theoretical predictions, although empirically, participants are overly reluctant to engage in repeated innovation attempts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Southern Economic Journal
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12788
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Discouraging Effect of Overconfidence

Klajdi Bregu, Cary Deck
Southern Economic Journal
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

The Discouraging Effect of Overconfidence

Klajdi Bregu, Cary Deck
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Overconfidence is often viewed as encouraging entrepreneurs and CEOs to follow risky strategies such as entering new markets, engaging in innovation, or pursuing mergers and acquisitions. While such undertakings can generate excess returns and profits, overconfidence is frequently offered as an explanation for why so many business ventures fail. However, we show that in a setting where the decision maker does not know whether success is possible, theoretically, overconfidence can also have a discouraging effect, causing one to give up too soon. This counterintuitive result is driven by effectively misattributing one's own failure to an elevated assessment of the chance that success is not possible. In a controlled laboratory experiment, we find general support for the theoretical predictions, although empirically, participants are overly reluctant to engage in repeated innovation attempts.

Southern Economic JournalVol. 92(3)
University of Alabama (US), Chapman University (US), Indiana University South Bend (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.