Interpretation of the lyric texts by the poets with different cognitive styles

The article discusses the features of the reader’s interpretation of poetic texts by I. Annensky and N. Gumilev, the authors of which belong to different types of cognitive styles. The concept of cognitive style arose in psychology, but as a result of the term being transferred into the field of cognitive poetics, it became necessary to describe its parameters in order to use it in the analysis of the poetic text. At the first stage of the study, it was necessary to find linguistic-stylistic analogues of the categories of the cognitive-style approach in psychology (field dependence / field independence, analyticity / syntheticity, intuitiveness / discursiveness, etc.). These style parameters can be found in the conceptual nodes of the cognitive program generating the text (the image of the author, the image of the addressee, the pragmatic attitude, the method of translation of the author’s model of the world). At the second stage of the study, the task to be solved was to consider the features of the reader’s interpretation of poetic texts, whose authors belong to different types of cognitive styles. The texts of the poets I. Annensky, whose cognitive style is characterized by the parameter of syntheticity, and those by N. Gumilyov, who is characterized by analyticity, were chosen for comparison. The experiment data showed that modern students experience significant difficulties when interpreting synthetic literary texts. Intuitively, at the level of sensations and emotions, readers grasp the general meaning of the poem, but the associative chains of the text are restored in less than ten percent of the works. N. Gumilyov’s poem is a poetic declaration built on a rhetorical principle – based on a figure of contrast. The impact of Gumilyov’s text is the impact of aphoristic poetic thought, to which readers readily respond. The conclusion is drawn on the productivity of applying the term “cognitive style” to both the process of text generation and text perception.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Izvestiya of Saratov University Philology Journalism
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18500/1817-7115-2025-25-3-248-256
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpretation of the lyric texts by the poets with different cognitive styles

Irina A. Tarasova
Izvestiya of Saratov University Philology Journalism
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

Interpretation of the lyric texts by the poets with different cognitive styles

Irina A. Tarasova
article en

Abstract

The article discusses the features of the reader’s interpretation of poetic texts by I. Annensky and N. Gumilev, the authors of which belong to different types of cognitive styles. The concept of cognitive style arose in psychology, but as a result of the term being transferred into the field of cognitive poetics, it became necessary to describe its parameters in order to use it in the analysis of the poetic text. At the first stage of the study, it was necessary to find linguistic-stylistic analogues of the categories of the cognitive-style approach in psychology (field dependence / field independence, analyticity / syntheticity, intuitiveness / discursiveness, etc.). These style parameters can be found in the conceptual nodes of the cognitive program generating the text (the image of the author, the image of the addressee, the pragmatic attitude, the method of translation of the author’s model of the world). At the second stage of the study, the task to be solved was to consider the features of the reader’s interpretation of poetic texts, whose authors belong to different types of cognitive styles. The texts of the poets I. Annensky, whose cognitive style is characterized by the parameter of syntheticity, and those by N. Gumilyov, who is characterized by analyticity, were chosen for comparison. The experiment data showed that modern students experience significant difficulties when interpreting synthetic literary texts. Intuitively, at the level of sensations and emotions, readers grasp the general meaning of the poem, but the associative chains of the text are restored in less than ten percent of the works. N. Gumilyov’s poem is a poetic declaration built on a rhetorical principle – based on a figure of contrast. The impact of Gumilyov’s text is the impact of aphoristic poetic thought, to which readers readily respond. The conclusion is drawn on the productivity of applying the term “cognitive style” to both the process of text generation and text perception.

Izvestiya of Saratov University Philology JournalismVol. 25(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interpretation of the lyric texts by the poets with different cognitive styles — Irina A. Tarasova · Izvestiya of Saratov University Philology Journalism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS