Labour dynamics, harvest cost and sharing behaviour in an Inuit mixed economy: How to adapt to a changing socio-ecological system?

The transition to a wage-based economy has altered the traditional sharing of country food practiced in many Northern communities, yet the degree of impact is relatively unknown. The trading of traditionally shared foods may not benefit everyone equally in the community, and decreased sharing may negatively impact vulnerable households that historically received food through the sharing networks. Sharing behaviour may also be linked to spatiotemporal variation in the availability of harvested species, the cost of hunting and fishing and labour market status of harvesters. We present the results of a multi-year harvest study paired with a socio-economic survey conducted in Gjoa Haven, Nunavut. We strive to identify the direct and indirect costs associated with harvesting country food, socioeconomic barriers to harvesting, seasonal trends in harvesting, and how these factors interact to influence sharing behaviour. We investigate the costs and benefits of hunting and fishing efforts, and the relationship between employment and harvest and sharing practices. We examine the distribution of country food, and how sharing varies by season, type of hunter, group size and mode of transport. We discuss insights for current hunter support and food security programmes, and a potential guaranteed basic income for households in a mixed economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108768
Primary Topic
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labour dynamics, harvest cost and sharing behaviour in an Inuit mixed economy: How to adapt to a changing socio-ecological system?

Stephan Schott, James Qitsualik, Jacqueline M. Chapman, Brent Puqiqnak
Ecological Economics
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
article

Labour dynamics, harvest cost and sharing behaviour in an Inuit mixed economy: How to adapt to a changing socio-ecological system?

Stephan Schott, James Qitsualik, Jacqueline M. Chapman, Brent Puqiqnak
article en

Abstract

The transition to a wage-based economy has altered the traditional sharing of country food practiced in many Northern communities, yet the degree of impact is relatively unknown. The trading of traditionally shared foods may not benefit everyone equally in the community, and decreased sharing may negatively impact vulnerable households that historically received food through the sharing networks. Sharing behaviour may also be linked to spatiotemporal variation in the availability of harvested species, the cost of hunting and fishing and labour market status of harvesters. We present the results of a multi-year harvest study paired with a socio-economic survey conducted in Gjoa Haven, Nunavut. We strive to identify the direct and indirect costs associated with harvesting country food, socioeconomic barriers to harvesting, seasonal trends in harvesting, and how these factors interact to influence sharing behaviour. We investigate the costs and benefits of hunting and fishing efforts, and the relationship between employment and harvest and sharing practices. We examine the distribution of country food, and how sharing varies by season, type of hunter, group size and mode of transport. We discuss insights for current hunter support and food security programmes, and a potential guaranteed basic income for households in a mixed economy.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 239
Government of Nunavut (CA), Carleton University (CA)
Genome Canada, Polar Knowledge Canada
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.