Comparative effects of focused ultrasound and microbubbles on healthy and tumor bearing rat spinal cord

This study examined the differential sensitivity of intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) and healthy tissue to focused ultrasound (FUS) and microbubbles in a rat model of IMSCT. F98 glioma cells were injected into spinal cords of F344 rats. FUS (580 kHz, 10 ms bursts, 1 Hz pulse repetition frequency, 40 s) was delivered to tumor and adjacent healthy tissue at varying pressures (0-1.2 MPa) following intravenous injection of microbubbles (1.00 ± 0.85 µm; 2.4 × 10<sup>7</sup> microbubbles/100 g). Tissues were collected 24 h post-treatment for histological analysis. Healthy tissue exhibited pressure-dependent damage, including significant differences in red blood cell (RBC) extravasation between 0 and 1.2 MPa conditions (0 ± 0 vs 1.73 × 10<sup>5</sup> ± 2.15 × 10<sup>5</sup>, p = 0.015), hemorrhagic pools, and tissue disintegration. Conversely, the presence of histopathological features in tumors, regardless of pressure, and no significant differences in RBC extravasation areas between exposure conditions suggests no treatment-induced damage at the tested exposures. These findings indicate F98 gliomas are less sensitive to FUS and microbubbles than healthy spinal cord, likely due to reduced vascularity (p < 0.00001 compared to grey matter, p < 0.05 compared to white matter). This finding indicates alternative strategies (e.g. nanodroplets or molecularly-targeted bubbles) must be explored for effectively treating CNS tumors with low vascularity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13722-9
Primary Topic
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effects of focused ultrasound and microbubbles on healthy and tumor bearing rat spinal cord

Meaghan A. O’Reilly, Cynthia Hawkins, Danielle M. Charron, Mahsa Mokhlesabadi
Scientific Reports
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
article

Comparative effects of focused ultrasound and microbubbles on healthy and tumor bearing rat spinal cord

Meaghan A. O’Reilly, Cynthia Hawkins, Danielle M. Charron, Mahsa Mokhlesabadi
article en

Abstract

This study examined the differential sensitivity of intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) and healthy tissue to focused ultrasound (FUS) and microbubbles in a rat model of IMSCT. F98 glioma cells were injected into spinal cords of F344 rats. FUS (580 kHz, 10 ms bursts, 1 Hz pulse repetition frequency, 40 s) was delivered to tumor and adjacent healthy tissue at varying pressures (0-1.2 MPa) following intravenous injection of microbubbles (1.00 ± 0.85 µm; 2.4 × 10<sup>7</sup> microbubbles/100 g). Tissues were collected 24 h post-treatment for histological analysis. Healthy tissue exhibited pressure-dependent damage, including significant differences in red blood cell (RBC) extravasation between 0 and 1.2 MPa conditions (0 ± 0 vs 1.73 × 10<sup>5</sup> ± 2.15 × 10<sup>5</sup>, p = 0.015), hemorrhagic pools, and tissue disintegration. Conversely, the presence of histopathological features in tumors, regardless of pressure, and no significant differences in RBC extravasation areas between exposure conditions suggests no treatment-induced damage at the tested exposures. These findings indicate F98 gliomas are less sensitive to FUS and microbubbles than healthy spinal cord, likely due to reduced vascularity (p < 0.00001 compared to grey matter, p < 0.05 compared to white matter). This finding indicates alternative strategies (e.g. nanodroplets or molecularly-targeted bubbles) must be explored for effectively treating CNS tumors with low vascularity.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Canada Research Chairs, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.