Mesozooplankton grazing patterns and preferences during a cyanobacterial harmful algal bloom (cHAB) in a large eutrophic lake

Mesozooplankton (200-2,000 µm) are an important link between primary producers and higher-level consumers and can influence phytoplankton biomass and community structure via grazing. Yet, during cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms (cHABs) we have a poor understanding of which food resources mesozooplankton use and their grazing pressure on phytoplankton. To investigate this, we conducted two gradient-grazer assays to measure mesozooplankton community grazing rates in western Lake Erie during the 2021 cHAB season. We measured mesozooplankton grazing on various food sources, including: total phytoplankton, phytoplankton major taxa (Cyanobacteria, Cryptophyta/Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta), and autotrophic and heterotrophic picoplankton and nanoplankton. We used these data to estimate mesozooplankton feeding selectivity, the importance of each food source toward mesozooplankton carbon intake, as well as the percent standing stock and growth consumed by mesozooplankton. Mesozooplankton selected for autotrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton, were neutrally selective for Cryptophyta/Bacillariophyta, and avoided Cyanobacteria and the total phytoplankton community. Mesozooplankton carbon intake was dominated by autotrophic nanoplankton and Cyanobacteria, indicating these food sources may be important in supporting zooplankton production during these cHAB events, although our understanding of the incorporation of Cyanobacteria carbon into mesozooplankton production is limited. While mesozooplankton grazed a small portion of total phytoplankton (1-12 % d<sup>-1</sup>) and Cyanobacteria (5-13 % d<sup>-1</sup>) standing stock biomass (<200 µm), they exerted a relatively stronger control on the growth of total phytoplankton (4-38 % d<sup>-1</sup>) and Cyanobacteria (64-106 % d<sup>-1</sup>), primarily due to the low measured growth rates of these food items during the study. Our results demonstrate that mesozooplankton graze on Cyanobacteria during cHAB events, and under the right conditions influence cHAB dynamics through direct consumption of Cyanobacteria and indirect effects on Cyanobacteria grazers and competitors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harmful Algae
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2025.102963
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mesozooplankton grazing patterns and preferences during a cyanobacterial harmful algal bloom (cHAB) in a large eutrophic lake

Zak J. Slagle, Dennis D. Peters, Lyndsie M. Collis, Henry A. Vanderploeg et al.
Harmful Algae
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
article

Mesozooplankton grazing patterns and preferences during a cyanobacterial harmful algal bloom (cHAB) in a large eutrophic lake

Zak J. Slagle, Dennis D. Peters, Lyndsie M. Collis, Henry A. Vanderploeg, M. D. Shaw, James M. Hood
article en

Abstract

Mesozooplankton (200-2,000 µm) are an important link between primary producers and higher-level consumers and can influence phytoplankton biomass and community structure via grazing. Yet, during cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms (cHABs) we have a poor understanding of which food resources mesozooplankton use and their grazing pressure on phytoplankton. To investigate this, we conducted two gradient-grazer assays to measure mesozooplankton community grazing rates in western Lake Erie during the 2021 cHAB season. We measured mesozooplankton grazing on various food sources, including: total phytoplankton, phytoplankton major taxa (Cyanobacteria, Cryptophyta/Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta), and autotrophic and heterotrophic picoplankton and nanoplankton. We used these data to estimate mesozooplankton feeding selectivity, the importance of each food source toward mesozooplankton carbon intake, as well as the percent standing stock and growth consumed by mesozooplankton. Mesozooplankton selected for autotrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton, were neutrally selective for Cryptophyta/Bacillariophyta, and avoided Cyanobacteria and the total phytoplankton community. Mesozooplankton carbon intake was dominated by autotrophic nanoplankton and Cyanobacteria, indicating these food sources may be important in supporting zooplankton production during these cHAB events, although our understanding of the incorporation of Cyanobacteria carbon into mesozooplankton production is limited. While mesozooplankton grazed a small portion of total phytoplankton (1-12 % d<sup>-1</sup>) and Cyanobacteria (5-13 % d<sup>-1</sup>) standing stock biomass (<200 µm), they exerted a relatively stronger control on the growth of total phytoplankton (4-38 % d<sup>-1</sup>) and Cyanobacteria (64-106 % d<sup>-1</sup>), primarily due to the low measured growth rates of these food items during the study. Our results demonstrate that mesozooplankton graze on Cyanobacteria during cHAB events, and under the right conditions influence cHAB dynamics through direct consumption of Cyanobacteria and indirect effects on Cyanobacteria grazers and competitors.

Harmful AlgaeVol. 150
Ohio Department of Natural Resources (US), NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.