What CMIP6 Models Tell Us About the Impact of AMOC Variability on the Arctic

Abstract In this paper we address the question whether variability in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and its associated heat transport at mid‐latitudes impacts the Arctic Earth system. To that end, we perform coherence analysis on time series of ocean heat transport, AMOC strength, and Arctic climate metrics across a large number of models from the CMIP6 ensemble. We find that, on multidecadal timescales, the majority of CMIP6 models indeed display a statistically significant relationship between AMOC at mid‐latitudes (45N) and metrics like Arctic surface air temperatures and sea ice. However, our results do not support the narrative that heat transport anomalies at lower latitudes propagate northward toward the Arctic. Instead, our results confirm that variability in meridional ocean heat transport arises in the subpolar North Atlantic and propagates southward and northward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl116282
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What CMIP6 Models Tell Us About the Impact of AMOC Variability on the Arctic

Younjoo Lee, Yiling Huo, Wilbert Weijer, Sergey Molodtsov et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
article

What CMIP6 Models Tell Us About the Impact of AMOC Variability on the Arctic

Younjoo Lee, Yiling Huo, Wilbert Weijer, Sergey Molodtsov, Prajvala Kurtakoti, Oluwayemi A. Garuba
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper we address the question whether variability in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and its associated heat transport at mid‐latitudes impacts the Arctic Earth system. To that end, we perform coherence analysis on time series of ocean heat transport, AMOC strength, and Arctic climate metrics across a large number of models from the CMIP6 ensemble. We find that, on multidecadal timescales, the majority of CMIP6 models indeed display a statistically significant relationship between AMOC at mid‐latitudes (45N) and metrics like Arctic surface air temperatures and sea ice. However, our results do not support the narrative that heat transport anomalies at lower latitudes propagate northward toward the Arctic. Instead, our results confirm that variability in meridional ocean heat transport arises in the subpolar North Atlantic and propagates southward and northward.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(17)
Planetary Science Institute (US), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), University of Alaska Fairbanks (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Naval Postgraduate School (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.