How do patients and health care professionals perceive de-implementation of routine follow-ups after total hip or knee arthroplasty? Protocol for a nested qualitative study within a hybrid effectiveness de-implementation trial

First, a pre-study reference panel will be organised to prepare a focus groups topics guide. Subsequently, 2 methods of data collection will be used: 8 focus groups with total of 80 participants from the main trial and 10 in-depth interviews with different HCPs. Thematic analysis using a deductive approach will be performed on anonymised transcripts to identify key themes. For this, the comparative case study framework and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability will be used. Findings will be used to inform the transition from RFU to COD if deemed acceptable by patients and HCPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330652
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do patients and health care professionals perceive de-implementation of routine follow-ups after total hip or knee arthroplasty? Protocol for a nested qualitative study within a hybrid effectiveness de-implementation trial

Lex D. de Jong, Nienke W. Willigenburg, Rudolf W. Poolman, Marijn Rutgers et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
2.01
article

How do patients and health care professionals perceive de-implementation of routine follow-ups after total hip or knee arthroplasty? Protocol for a nested qualitative study within a hybrid effectiveness de-implementation trial

Lex D. de Jong, Nienke W. Willigenburg, Rudolf W. Poolman, Marijn Rutgers, Ronald A.W. Verhagen, Sigrid Vorrink, Ariena J. Rasker, Jantsje H. Pasma, Dominique C. Baas, Lidy A.C. Roubos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

First, a pre-study reference panel will be organised to prepare a focus groups topics guide. Subsequently, 2 methods of data collection will be used: 8 focus groups with total of 80 participants from the main trial and 10 in-depth interviews with different HCPs. Thematic analysis using a deductive approach will be performed on anonymised transcripts to identify key themes. For this, the comparative case study framework and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability will be used. Findings will be used to inform the transition from RFU to COD if deemed acceptable by patients and HCPs.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(8)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), OLVG (NL), Haga Hospital (NL), Tergooi (NL), Rijnstate Hospital (NL)
ZonMw
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
2.01
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How do patients and health care professionals perceive de-implementation of routine follow-ups after total hip or knee arthroplasty? Protocol for a nested qualitative study within a hybrid effectiveness de-implementation trial — Lex D. de Jong, Nienke W. Willigenburg, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS