Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Science Education: Factors Influencing Science Teachers' Intention to Use: A Systematic Literature Review

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the educational landscape, with profound implications for science education.However, the successful integration of AI-based tools depends on science teachers' acceptance and their ability to effectively incorporate these technologies into their instructional practices.This systematic review examines the acceptance of AI in science education by analyzing the factors influencing science teachers' intention to use AI-based tools and the challenges associated with AI adoption.Following PRISMA guidelines, this review includes 12 empirical studies published between 2021 and 2025.The results indicate that teachers' intention to use AI is primarily influenced by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which is rooted in the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and its extension, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB).Some studies also incorporate other models, such as TPACK and path analysis frameworks.Key influencing factors include technological perceptions, psychological attributes, social influences, and pedagogical considerations.The review further highlights challenges that impede AI integration, including inadequate training and professional development (PD), technological and infrastructural limitations, pedagogical concerns, and ethical considerations.The findings of this review provide valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and researchers aiming to promote effective and equitable AI adoption in science education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v14-i3/26113
Primary Topic
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Science Education: Factors Influencing Science Teachers' Intention to Use: A Systematic Literature Review

Nurfaradilla Mohd Nasri, Oh Ya Wen
1 links
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
article

Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Science Education: Factors Influencing Science Teachers' Intention to Use: A Systematic Literature Review

Nurfaradilla Mohd Nasri, Oh Ya Wen
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the educational landscape, with profound implications for science education.However, the successful integration of AI-based tools depends on science teachers' acceptance and their ability to effectively incorporate these technologies into their instructional practices.This systematic review examines the acceptance of AI in science education by analyzing the factors influencing science teachers' intention to use AI-based tools and the challenges associated with AI adoption.Following PRISMA guidelines, this review includes 12 empirical studies published between 2021 and 2025.The results indicate that teachers' intention to use AI is primarily influenced by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which is rooted in the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and its extension, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB).Some studies also incorporate other models, such as TPACK and path analysis frameworks.Key influencing factors include technological perceptions, psychological attributes, social influences, and pedagogical considerations.The review further highlights challenges that impede AI integration, including inadequate training and professional development (PD), technological and infrastructural limitations, pedagogical concerns, and ethical considerations.The findings of this review provide valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and researchers aiming to promote effective and equitable AI adoption in science education.

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and DevelopmentVol. 14(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.