Provision for Love: Mundane Goods and Familial Affection in Eighteenth-Century England
Background and Objectives: The provision of household consumer goods has long been a subject of study among the historians of family and gender. Previous research has focused on luxurious goods to show consumers’ social status; however, research on spending practices and everyday commodities remains scarce, and studies that explore their impact on family relationships are even more limited. This research article studies the men and women in eighteenth-century English society in the context of familial relationships and explores the meanings of familial love as reflected in the activity of purchasing goods in daily life. Thus, activities, not objects, are the main focus of this article. This article aims to consider what every day purchasing activities meant to the people in eighteenth-century England and how such activities affected familial relationships. This article shows the attitudes of the English people in that period towards familial relationships and demonstrates the meaning and key characteristics of familial love. Methods: This article considers purchasing activities as a cultural symbolic form, which the eighteenth-century English people used to convey attitudes towards family relationships. It studies the meanings of familial love appearing in interpersonal relationships. This research article studies the personal letters of four eighteenth-century English families garnered from provincial archives in the United Kingdom, and these are original handwritten letters that have not yet been officially published. These letters offer useful information to understand the family relationships in each family studied, enabling us to understand the meaning and the importance of everyday purchasing activities to their familial relationships in a clear manner. Results: This article suggests that mundane daily activities are worth studying. Looking at how the eighteenth-century English families provided their family members with everyday household items, we cannot deny that feeding, clothing and giving gifts were conducted with affective emotions. Shopping for family members proved to be significant moments for fostering family bonds. Likewise, gift-giving played a more active role in expressing familial love, concern, and care, rather than an expression of an informal support. It was not an object, but an everyday activity which was important to understanding the meaning of familial love. Goods acquisition in daily life and the quality of attentiveness were the important factors that nurtured familial relationships and enabled intimacy. This article proposes that familial love meant attentiveness and devotion to family members. As shown in the article, family members were attentive to one another with an emphasis on expressing those emotions in family letters. Application of this study: This article demonstrates that mundane daily activities are issues worthy of consideration, especially when historians consider the people’s life experiences documented in personal letters. Such a reading method can pave a new way for studying mundane, everyday activities, and this approach enables historians to gain a more comprehensive understanding of people’s lives in the past. It can be useful for studying the history of everyday life in Thai Studies as well, due to the limited amount of research conducted in this area. Conclusions: In the eighteenth century, the provision of everyday household items for family members played a vital role in maintaining and strengthening familial bonds. Everyday activities that appeared mundane may have a far greater impact on family relationships than previously thought.
Authors
- Tul Israngura Na Ayudhya
- Nisarat Kunthapoke
Institutions
- Chulalongkorn University (TH)
- Kasetsart University (TH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Arts and Thai Studies
- Published
- 2025-08-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.69598/artssu.2025.5144.
- Primary Topic
- Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00