Equitable food systems in practice? The case of smallholders’ marketing of legumes in Malawi

We assess how Malawian smallholder farmers engage with legume markets in Dowa district and how these markets function to either support or hinder equitable livelihoods. The analysis is based on mixed methods, including surveying households that grow and sell soybeans, groundnuts, and common beans, farmer focus group discussions, in-depth interviews with traders and processors, and key informant interviews with market facilitatory actors. Our theoretical framework draws from food systems, equity, and farmer typology. We found that most farmers in Dowa rarely sell their legumes in the markets they perceive as lucrative namely, to large-scale traders and processors, as these markets require substantial volumes per sale and are often located far from the farms. The state-run Agricultural Development Market Corporation turned out to be ineffective. Yet, it remains the farmers’ preferred market option due to its history of adhering to floor prices and using accurate scales. Village and mobile traders are the main commodity off-takers, despite farmers reporting that they buy below the set floor prices and use inaccurate scales. In turn, the village and mobile traders face challenges in dealing with smallholder farmers, such as commodity adulteration, sparsely located farmers, and the distances travelled to gather significant volumes of commodity. Large-scale traders and processors provide village and mobile traders with the most viable offloading options. Village, district, and large-scale traders all reported declining market opportunities driven by unfavourable trade policies, which are seen to be lobbied by powerful actors in the legume supply chains; ultimately this affects how traders interact with farmers. Many smallholder farmers in the “dropping out” and “hanging in” categories are indebted and engage in advance crop sale debts, which seems to contribute towards inequity rather than equity. Despite the prevalence of market policies to protect smallholder farmers from exploitation, implementation is challenging, thus rendering market control on paper and market liberalisation in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1542976
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equitable food systems in practice? The case of smallholders’ marketing of legumes in Malawi

Ruth Haug, Mayamiko Nathaniel Kakwera, Daimon Kambewa
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Equitable food systems in practice? The case of smallholders’ marketing of legumes in Malawi

Ruth Haug, Mayamiko Nathaniel Kakwera, Daimon Kambewa
article en

Abstract

We assess how Malawian smallholder farmers engage with legume markets in Dowa district and how these markets function to either support or hinder equitable livelihoods. The analysis is based on mixed methods, including surveying households that grow and sell soybeans, groundnuts, and common beans, farmer focus group discussions, in-depth interviews with traders and processors, and key informant interviews with market facilitatory actors. Our theoretical framework draws from food systems, equity, and farmer typology. We found that most farmers in Dowa rarely sell their legumes in the markets they perceive as lucrative namely, to large-scale traders and processors, as these markets require substantial volumes per sale and are often located far from the farms. The state-run Agricultural Development Market Corporation turned out to be ineffective. Yet, it remains the farmers’ preferred market option due to its history of adhering to floor prices and using accurate scales. Village and mobile traders are the main commodity off-takers, despite farmers reporting that they buy below the set floor prices and use inaccurate scales. In turn, the village and mobile traders face challenges in dealing with smallholder farmers, such as commodity adulteration, sparsely located farmers, and the distances travelled to gather significant volumes of commodity. Large-scale traders and processors provide village and mobile traders with the most viable offloading options. Village, district, and large-scale traders all reported declining market opportunities driven by unfavourable trade policies, which are seen to be lobbied by powerful actors in the legume supply chains; ultimately this affects how traders interact with farmers. Many smallholder farmers in the “dropping out” and “hanging in” categories are indebted and engage in advance crop sale debts, which seems to contribute towards inequity rather than equity. Despite the prevalence of market policies to protect smallholder farmers from exploitation, implementation is challenging, thus rendering market control on paper and market liberalisation in practice.

Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 9
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (MW), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.